Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom,pmic-gpio: Allow gpio-hog nodes

From: Luca Weiss
Date: Mon Apr 08 2024 - 14:36:20 EST


On Montag, 8. April 2024 19:26:49 CEST Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
> On 4/8/24 18:39, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > Allow specifying a GPIO hog, as already used on
> > qcom-msm8974-lge-nexus5-hammerhead.dts.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml | 12 ++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml
> > index a786357ed1af..510a05369dbb 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml
> > @@ -424,6 +424,10 @@ patternProperties:
> > $ref: "#/$defs/qcom-pmic-gpio-state"
> > additionalProperties: false
> >
> > + "^(hog-[0-9]+|.+-hog(-[0-9]+)?)$":
>
> I see a couple bindings do this, but I'm not sure if we want two
> allow two styles for no reason.. Rob?

This regex is actually from the gpio-hog.yaml base
https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/blob/main/dtschema/schemas/gpio/gpio-hog.yaml#L23

Why it's made this way I cannot tell you, but I didn't want to 'artifically'
restrict the pattern for qcom,pmic-gpio.

>
> Konrad
>