RE: [PATCH v3 4/5] media: chips-media: wave5: drop "sram-size" DT prop

From: jackson . lee
Date: Tue Apr 09 2024 - 00:50:32 EST


Hey Ivan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan Bornyakov <brnkv.i1@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, April 6, 2024 1:41 AM
> To: Nas Chung <nas.chung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; jackson.lee
> <jackson.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sebastian Fricke
> <sebastian.fricke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ivan Bornyakov <brnkv.i1@xxxxxxxxx>; linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PATCH v3 4/5] media: chips-media: wave5: drop "sram-size" DT
> prop
>
> Move excessive "sram-size" device-tree property to device match data.
> Also change SRAM memory allocation strategy: instead of allocation exact
> sram_size bytes, allocate all available SRAM memory up to sram_size.
> Add placeholders wave5_vpu_dec_validate_sec_axi() and
> wave5_vpu_enc_validate_sec_axi() for validation that allocated SRAM memory
> is enough to decode/encode bitstream of given resolution.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Bornyakov <brnkv.i1@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-hw.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++--
> .../platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vdi.c | 21 ++++---
> .../platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu.c | 11 ++--
> 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-hw.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-hw.c
> index cdd0a0948a94..36f2fc818013 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-hw.c
> @@ -843,6 +843,36 @@ int wave5_vpu_dec_register_framebuffer(struct
> vpu_instance *inst, struct frame_b
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static u32 wave5_vpu_dec_validate_sec_axi(struct vpu_instance *inst) {
> + struct dec_info *p_dec_info = &inst->codec_info->dec_info;
> + u32 bit_size = 0, ip_size = 0, lf_size = 0, ret = 0;

The bit_size, ip_size and 1f_size is always 0? If so, why are you using them ?


> + u32 sram_size = inst->dev->sram_size;
> +
> + if (!sram_size)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * TODO: calculate bit_size, ip_size, lf_size from inst-
> >src_fmt.width
> + * and inst->codec_info->dec_info.initial_info.luma_bitdepth
> + */
> +
> + if (p_dec_info->sec_axi_info.use_bit_enable && sram_size >=
> bit_size) {
> + ret |= BIT(0);
> + sram_size -= bit_size;
> + }
> +
> + if (p_dec_info->sec_axi_info.use_ip_enable && sram_size >= ip_size)
> {
> + ret |= BIT(9);
> + sram_size -= ip_size;
> + }
> +
> + if (p_dec_info->sec_axi_info.use_lf_row_enable && sram_size >=
> lf_size)
> + ret |= BIT(15);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> int wave5_vpu_decode(struct vpu_instance *inst, u32 *fail_res) {
> u32 reg_val;
> @@ -855,9 +885,7 @@ int wave5_vpu_decode(struct vpu_instance *inst, u32
> *fail_res)
> vpu_write_reg(inst->dev, W5_BS_OPTION,
> get_bitstream_options(p_dec_info));
>
> /* secondary AXI */
> - reg_val = p_dec_info->sec_axi_info.use_bit_enable |
> - (p_dec_info->sec_axi_info.use_ip_enable << 9) |
> - (p_dec_info->sec_axi_info.use_lf_row_enable << 15);
> + reg_val = wave5_vpu_dec_validate_sec_axi(inst);
> vpu_write_reg(inst->dev, W5_USE_SEC_AXI, reg_val);
>
> /* set attributes of user buffer */
> @@ -1938,6 +1966,31 @@ int wave5_vpu_enc_register_framebuffer(struct
> device *dev, struct vpu_instance *
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static u32 wave5_vpu_enc_validate_sec_axi(struct vpu_instance *inst) {
> + struct enc_info *p_enc_info = &inst->codec_info->enc_info;
> + u32 rdo_size = 0, lf_size = 0, ret = 0;

The rdo_size and 1f_size is always 0? If so, why are you using them ?

> + u32 sram_size = inst->dev->sram_size;
> +
> + if (!sram_size)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * TODO: calculate rdo_size and lf_size from inst->src_fmt.width
> and
> + * inst->codec_info-
> >enc_info.open_param.wave_param.internal_bit_depth
> + */
> +
> + if (p_enc_info->sec_axi_info.use_enc_rdo_enable && sram_size >=
> rdo_size) {
> + ret |= BIT(11);
> + sram_size -= rdo_size;
> + }
> +
> + if (p_enc_info->sec_axi_info.use_enc_lf_enable && sram_size >=
> lf_size)
> + ret |= BIT(15);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> int wave5_vpu_encode(struct vpu_instance *inst, struct enc_param *option,
> u32 *fail_res) {
> u32 src_frame_format;
> @@ -1959,8 +2012,7 @@ int wave5_vpu_encode(struct vpu_instance *inst,
> struct enc_param *option, u32 *f
>
> vpu_write_reg(inst->dev, W5_CMD_ENC_PIC_SRC_AXI_SEL,
> DEFAULT_SRC_AXI);
> /* secondary AXI */
> - reg_val = (p_enc_info->sec_axi_info.use_enc_rdo_enable << 11) |
> - (p_enc_info->sec_axi_info.use_enc_lf_enable << 15);
> + reg_val = wave5_vpu_enc_validate_sec_axi(inst);
> vpu_write_reg(inst->dev, W5_CMD_ENC_PIC_USE_SEC_AXI, reg_val);
>
> vpu_write_reg(inst->dev, W5_CMD_ENC_PIC_REPORT_PARAM, 0); diff --
> git a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vdi.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vdi.c
> index 3809f70bc0b4..556de2f043fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vdi.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vdi.c


The below code is not based on the current upstream code. Where did you get the original code ?

> @@ -174,16 +174,19 @@ int wave5_vdi_allocate_array(struct vpu_device
> *vpu_dev, struct vpu_buf *array, void wave5_vdi_allocate_sram(struct
> vpu_device *vpu_dev) {
> struct vpu_buf *vb = &vpu_dev->sram_buf;
> + dma_addr_t daddr;
> + void *vaddr;
> + size_t size;
>
> - if (!vpu_dev->sram_pool || !vpu_dev->sram_size)
> + if (!vpu_dev->sram_pool || vb->vaddr)
> return;
>
> - if (!vb->vaddr) {
> - vb->size = vpu_dev->sram_size;
> - vb->vaddr = gen_pool_dma_alloc(vpu_dev->sram_pool, vb->size,
> - &vb->daddr);
> - if (!vb->vaddr)
> - vb->size = 0;
> + size = min_t(size_t, vpu_dev->sram_size, gen_pool_avail(vpu_dev-
> >sram_pool));
> + vaddr = gen_pool_dma_alloc(vpu_dev->sram_pool, size, &daddr);
> + if (vaddr) {
> + vb->vaddr = vaddr;
> + vb->daddr = daddr;
> + vb->size = size;
> }
>
> dev_dbg(vpu_dev->dev, "%s: sram daddr: %pad, size: %zu, vaddr:
> 0x%p\n", @@ -197,9 +200,7 @@ void wave5_vdi_free_sram(struct vpu_device
> *vpu_dev)
> if (!vb->size || !vb->vaddr)
> return;
>
> - if (vb->vaddr)
> - gen_pool_free(vpu_dev->sram_pool, (unsigned long)vb->vaddr,
> - vb->size);
> + gen_pool_free(vpu_dev->sram_pool, (unsigned long)vb->vaddr, vb-
> >size);
>
> memset(vb, 0, sizeof(*vb));
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu.c
> index 1e631da58e15..9e93969ab6db 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> struct wave5_match_data {
> int flags;
> const char *fw_name;
> + u32 sram_size;
> };
>
> int wave5_vpu_wait_interrupt(struct vpu_instance *inst, unsigned int
> timeout) @@ -177,17 +178,12 @@ static int wave5_vpu_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> goto err_reset_assert;
> }
>
> - ret = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "sram-size",
> - &dev->sram_size);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "sram-size not found\n");
> - dev->sram_size = 0;
> - }
> -
> dev->sram_pool = of_gen_pool_get(pdev->dev.of_node, "sram", 0);
> if (!dev->sram_pool)
> dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "sram node not found\n");
>
> + dev->sram_size = match_data->sram_size;
> +
> dev->product_code = wave5_vdi_read_register(dev,
> VPU_PRODUCT_CODE_REGISTER);
> ret = wave5_vdi_init(&pdev->dev);
> if (ret < 0) {
> @@ -281,6 +277,7 @@ static void wave5_vpu_remove(struct platform_device
> *pdev) static const struct wave5_match_data ti_wave521c_data = {
> .flags = WAVE5_IS_ENC | WAVE5_IS_DEC,
> .fw_name = "cnm/wave521c_k3_codec_fw.bin",
> + .sram_size = (64 * 1024),
> };
>
> static const struct of_device_id wave5_dt_ids[] = {
> --
> 2.44.0