Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] perf: Remove perf_swevent_get_recursion_context() from perf_pending_task().

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

On 2024-04-09 00:06:00 [+0200], Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> > index e0b2da8de485f..5400f7ed2f98b 100644
> > --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> > @@ -6785,14 +6785,6 @@ static void perf_pending_irq(struct irq_work *entry)
> >  static void perf_pending_task(struct callback_head *head)
> >  {
> >  	struct perf_event *event = container_of(head, struct perf_event, pending_task);
> > -	int rctx;
> > -
> > -	/*
> > -	 * If we 'fail' here, that's OK, it means recursion is already disabled
> > -	 * and we won't recurse 'further'.
> > -	 */
> > -	preempt_disable_notrace();
> > -	rctx = perf_swevent_get_recursion_context();
> >  
> >  	if (event->pending_work) {
> >  		event->pending_work = 0;
> > @@ -6800,10 +6792,6 @@ static void perf_pending_task(struct callback_head *head)
> >  		local_dec(&event->ctx->nr_pending);
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (rctx >= 0)
> > -		perf_swevent_put_recursion_context(rctx);
> > -	preempt_enable_notrace();
> 
> Well, if a software event happens during perf_sigtrap(), the task work
> may be requeued endlessly and the task may get stuck in task_work_run()...

The last time I checked it had no users in the task context. How would
that happen?

Sebastian