Re: [PATCH net-next v11 00/13] Introduce PHY listing and link_topology tracking

From: Maxime Chevallier
Date: Tue Apr 09 2024 - 03:23:05 EST


On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 01:50:54 +0200
Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > Here is the summary with links:
> > > - [net-next,v11,01/13] net: phy: Introduce ethernet link topology representation
> > > https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/6916e461e793
> > > - [net-next,v11,02/13] net: sfp: pass the phy_device when disconnecting an sfp module's PHY
> > > https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/0ec5ed6c130e
> > > - [net-next,v11,03/13] net: phy: add helpers to handle sfp phy connect/disconnect
> > > https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/e75e4e074c44
> > > - [net-next,v11,04/13] net: sfp: Add helper to return the SFP bus name
> > > https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/fdd353965b52
> > > - [net-next,v11,05/13] net: ethtool: Allow passing a phy index for some commands
> > > https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/841942bc6212
> > > - [net-next,v11,06/13] netlink: specs: add phy-index as a header parameter
> > > (no matching commit)
> > > - [net-next,v11,07/13] net: ethtool: Introduce a command to list PHYs on an interface
> > > (no matching commit)
> > > - [net-next,v11,08/13] netlink: specs: add ethnl PHY_GET command set
> > > (no matching commit)
> > > - [net-next,v11,09/13] net: ethtool: plca: Target the command to the requested PHY
> > > (no matching commit)
> > > - [net-next,v11,10/13] net: ethtool: pse-pd: Target the command to the requested PHY
> > > (no matching commit)
> > > - [net-next,v11,11/13] net: ethtool: cable-test: Target the command to the requested PHY
> > > (no matching commit)
> > > - [net-next,v11,12/13] net: ethtool: strset: Allow querying phy stats by index
> > > (no matching commit)
> > > - [net-next,v11,13/13] Documentation: networking: document phy_link_topology
> > > (no matching commit)
> >
> > It looks like commits 6 to 13 didn't make it upstream with (the "no
> > matching commit" messages above). Is that expected ?
>
> They are not in net-next, unlike 1-5.
>
> You probably need to repost them.

I'll repost indeed.

Thanks Andrew BTW for all the reviews !

Maxime