Re: [net-next PATCH] octeontx2-pf: Add support for offload tc with skbedit mark action

From: Paolo Abeni
Date: Tue Apr 09 2024 - 08:07:40 EST


On Mon, 2024-04-08 at 12:56 +0530, Geetha sowjanya wrote:
> Support offloading of skbedit mark action.
>
> For example, to mark with 0x0008, with dest ip 60.60.60.2 on eth2
> interface:
>
> # tc qdisc add dev eth2 ingress
> # tc filter add dev eth2 ingress protocol ip flower \
> dst_ip 60.60.60.2 action skbedit mark 0x0008 skip_sw
>
> Signed-off-by: Geetha sowjanya <gakula@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_fs.c | 2 ++
> .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.h | 2 ++
> .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_tc.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_txrx.c | 3 +++
> .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_txrx.h | 3 +++
> 5 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_fs.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_fs.c
> index c75669c8fde7..6188921e9a20 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_fs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_fs.c
> @@ -1183,6 +1183,8 @@ static int npc_update_rx_entry(struct rvu *rvu, struct rvu_pfvf *pfvf,
> action.pf_func = target;
> action.op = NIX_RX_ACTIONOP_UCAST;
> }
> + if (req->match_id)
> + action.match_id = req->match_id;
> }
>
> entry->action = *(u64 *)&action;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.h
> index 06910307085e..815ae13c371c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.h
> @@ -363,6 +363,7 @@ struct otx2_flow_config {
> struct list_head flow_list;
> u32 dmacflt_max_flows;
> u16 max_flows;
> + u16 mark_flows;

Since the above fields is used as (reference) counter for the
OTX2_FLAG_TC_MARK_ENABLED bit, what about using a refcount_t, so you
gain sanity checks for free?

Thanks!

Paolo