Re: Nohz_full on boot CPU is broken (was: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] wq: Avoid using isolated cpus' timers on queue_delayed_work)

From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Tue Apr 09 2024 - 09:09:29 EST


On 04/09, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> Le Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 03:09:14PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov a écrit :
> > Well, the changelog says
> >
> > nohz_full has been trialed at a large supercomputer site and found to
> > significantly reduce jitter. In order to deploy it in production, they
> > need CPU0 to be nohz_full
> >
> > so I guess this feature has users.
> >
> > But after the commit aae17ebb53cd3da ("workqueue: Avoid using isolated cpus'
> > timers on queue_delayed_work") the kernel will crash at boot time if the boot
> > CPU is nohz_full.
>
> Right but there are many possible calls to housekeeping on boot before the
> first housekeeper becomes online.

Well, it seems that other callers are more or less fine in this respect...
At least the kernel boots fine with that commit reverted.

But a) I didn't try to really check, and b) this doesn't matter.

I agree, and that is why I never blamed this change in queue_delayed_work().

OK, you seem to agree with the patch below, I'll write the changelog/comment
and send it "officially".

Or did I misunderstand you?

Oleg.


diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
index 373d42c707bc..e912555c6fc8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
@@ -46,7 +46,11 @@ int housekeeping_any_cpu(enum hk_type type)
if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
return cpu;

- return cpumask_any_and(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], cpu_online_mask);
+ cpu = cpumask_any_and(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], cpu_online_mask);
+ if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
+ return cpu;
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING);
}
}
return smp_processor_id();