Re: [PATCH] arm64: arm_pmuv3: Correctly extract and check the PMUVer

From: Will Deacon
Date: Tue Apr 09 2024 - 12:09:33 EST


On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 04:11:58PM +0800, Yicong Yang wrote:
> From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Currently we're using "sbfx" to extract the PMUVer from ID_AA64DFR0_EL1
> and skip the init/reset if no PMU present when the extracted PMUVer is
> negative or is zero. However for PMUv3p8 the PMUVer will be 0b1000 and
> PMUVer extracted by "sbfx" will always be negative and we'll skip the
> init/reset in __init_el2_debug/reset_pmuserenr_el0 unexpectedly.
>
> So this patch use "ubfx" instead of "sbfx" to extract the PMUVer. If
> the PMUVer is implementation defined (0b1111) then reset it to zero
> and skip the reset/init. Previously we'll also skip the init/reset
> if the PMUVer is higher than the version we known (currently PMUv3p9),
> with this patch we'll only skip if the PMU is not implemented or
> implementation defined. This keeps consistence with how we probe
> the PMU in the driver with pmuv3_implemented().
>
> Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h | 5 ++++-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h | 5 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> index ab8b396428da..3b7373d6c565 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> @@ -480,7 +480,10 @@ alternative_endif
> */
> .macro reset_pmuserenr_el0, tmpreg
> mrs \tmpreg, id_aa64dfr0_el1
> - sbfx \tmpreg, \tmpreg, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_SHIFT, #4
> + ubfx \tmpreg, \tmpreg, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_SHIFT, #4
> + cmp \tmpreg, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP_DEF
> + csel \tmpreg, xzr, \tmpreg, eq // If PMU's IMP_DEF, regard it
> + // as not implemented and skip
> cmp \tmpreg, #1 // Skip if no PMU present
> b.lt 9000f
> msr pmuserenr_el0, xzr // Disable PMU access from EL0

I think the cmp/csel/cmp/b.lt sequence might be a little tidier if you
reworked it to use ccmp. For example, something like (totally untested):

cmp \tmpreg, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_NI
ccmp \tmpreg, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP_DEF, #4, ne

would then, I think, mean we could just b.eq 9000f. But please check
this because encoding nzcv as an immediate always catches me out.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> index b7afaa026842..2438e12b60c5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> @@ -59,7 +59,10 @@
>
> .macro __init_el2_debug
> mrs x1, id_aa64dfr0_el1
> - sbfx x0, x1, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_SHIFT, #4
> + ubfx x0, x1, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_SHIFT, #4
> + cmp x0, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP_DEF
> + csel x0, xzr, x0, eq // If PMU's IMP_DEF, regard it
> + // as not implemented and skip
> cmp x0, #1
> b.lt .Lskip_pmu_\@ // Skip if no PMU present
> mrs x0, pmcr_el0 // Disable debug access traps

Similar sort of thing here.

Will