Re: [REGRESSION] mainline boot regression on AMD Stoney Ridge Chromebooks

From: Laura Nao
Date: Wed Apr 10 2024 - 04:15:32 EST


Hi Thomas,

On 4/9/24 14:25, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Laura!
>
> On Tue, Apr 09 2024 at 12:07, Laura Nao wrote:
>> On 4/8/24 16:19, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> That's the commit right before switching over and according to your
>>> bisect it works. Now apply the patch below, which just runs the new
>>> topology scan function but discards the result.
>>
>> The ace278e7eca6 revision with the patch you provided boots correctly.
>
> Progress :)
>

Indeed :)

> Can you please replace that patch with the one below?

So, with this patch applied on top of ace278e7eca6 the kernel doesn't
boot anymore - reference test job:
https://lava.collabora.dev/scheduler/job/13324010

I see the only change between the second and third patch you provided,
besides the debug prints, is:

- if (!topo_is_converted(c))
- return;
-

Printing the debug information without this probably doesn't really help,
but just in case it's useful: I tried excluding the change above from the
patch while leaving everything else unchanged - reference test job:
https://lava.collabora.dev/scheduler/job/13324298 (also pasted the
kernel log here for easier consultation: https://pastebin.com/raw/TQBDvCah)

Hope this helps,

Laura

>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
> ---
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> @@ -1616,6 +1616,13 @@ void __init early_cpu_init(void)
> #endif
> }
> early_identify_cpu(&boot_cpu_data);
> +
> + pr_info("Max cores: %u\n", boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores);
> + pr_info("pkg %u die %u core %u nid %u\n", boot_cpu_data.topo.pkg_id,
> + boot_cpu_data.topo.die_id, boot_cpu_data.topo.core_id,
> + boot_cpu_data.topo.amd_node_id);
> + pr_info("SNS %u\n", smp_num_siblings);
> + pr_info("NPP %u MDPP %u\n", __amd_nodes_per_pkg, __max_die_per_package);
> }
>
> static bool detect_null_seg_behavior(void)
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_amd.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,17 @@ static bool parse_8000_0008(struct topo_
> if (!sft)
> sft = get_count_order(ecx.cpu_nthreads + 1);
>
> - topology_set_dom(tscan, TOPO_SMT_DOMAIN, sft, ecx.cpu_nthreads + 1);
> + /*
> + * cpu_nthreads describes the number of threads in the package
> + * sft is the number of APIC ID bits per package
> + *
> + * As the number of actual threads per core is not described in
> + * this leaf, just set the CORE domain shift and let the later
> + * parsers set SMT shift. Assume one thread per core by default
> + * which is correct if there are no other CPUID leafs to parse.
> + */
> + topology_update_dom(tscan, TOPO_SMT_DOMAIN, 0, 1);
> + topology_set_dom(tscan, TOPO_CORE_DOMAIN, sft, ecx.cpu_nthreads + 1);
> return true;
> }
>
> @@ -73,12 +83,14 @@ static bool parse_8000_001e(struct topo_
> tscan->c->topo.initial_apicid = leaf.ext_apic_id;
>
> /*
> - * If leaf 0xb is available, then SMT shift is set already. If not
> - * take it from ecx.threads_per_core and use topo_update_dom() -
> - * topology_set_dom() would propagate and overwrite the already
> - * propagated CORE level.
> + * If leaf 0xb is available, then the domain shifts are set
> + * already and nothing to do here.
> */
> if (!has_0xb) {
> + /*
> + * Leaf 0x80000008 set the CORE domain shift already.
> + * Update the SMT domain, but do not propagate it.
> + */
> unsigned int nthreads = leaf.core_nthreads + 1;
>
> topology_update_dom(tscan, TOPO_SMT_DOMAIN, get_count_order(nthreads), nthreads);
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_common.c
> @@ -133,6 +133,10 @@ static void parse_topology(struct topo_s
> tscan->ebx1_nproc_shift = get_count_order(ebx.nproc);
>
> switch (c->x86_vendor) {
> + case X86_VENDOR_AMD:
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD))
> + cpu_parse_topology_amd(tscan);
> + break;
> case X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR:
> case X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN:
> parse_legacy(tscan);
> @@ -162,6 +166,9 @@ static void topo_set_ids(struct topo_sca
>
> if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD)
> cpu_topology_fixup_amd(tscan);
> +
> + pr_info("pkg %u die %u core %u nid %u\n", c->topo.pkg_id, c->topo.die_id,
> + c->topo.core_id, c->topo.amd_node_id);
> }
>
> static void topo_set_max_cores(struct topo_scan *tscan)
> @@ -175,6 +182,7 @@ static void topo_set_max_cores(struct to
> */
> tscan->c->x86_max_cores = tscan->dom_ncpus[TOPO_DIEGRP_DOMAIN] >>
> x86_topo_system.dom_shifts[TOPO_SMT_DOMAIN];
> + pr_info("Max cores: %u\n", tscan->c->x86_max_cores);
> }
>
> void cpu_parse_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> @@ -215,18 +223,19 @@ void __init cpu_init_topology(struct cpu
>
> parse_topology(&tscan, true);
>
> - if (!topo_is_converted(c))
> - return;
> -
> /* Copy the shift values and calculate the unit sizes. */
> memcpy(x86_topo_system.dom_shifts, tscan.dom_shifts, sizeof(x86_topo_system.dom_shifts));
>
> dom = TOPO_SMT_DOMAIN;
> x86_topo_system.dom_size[dom] = 1U << x86_topo_system.dom_shifts[dom];
> + pr_info("Dom %u Sft: %u Sz: %u\n", dom, x86_topo_system.dom_size[dom],
> + x86_topo_system.dom_shifts[dom]);
>
> for (dom++; dom < TOPO_MAX_DOMAIN; dom++) {
> sft = x86_topo_system.dom_shifts[dom] - x86_topo_system.dom_shifts[dom - 1];
> x86_topo_system.dom_size[dom] = 1U << sft;
> + pr_info("Dom %u Sft: %u Sz: %u\n", dom, x86_topo_system.dom_size[dom],
> + x86_topo_system.dom_shifts[dom]);
> }
>
> topo_set_ids(&tscan);
> @@ -238,6 +247,7 @@ void __init cpu_init_topology(struct cpu
> * changes further down the road to get it right during early boot.
> */
> smp_num_siblings = tscan.dom_ncpus[TOPO_SMT_DOMAIN];
> + pr_info("SNS %u\n", smp_num_siblings);
>
> /*
> * Neither it's clear whether there are as many dies as the APIC
> @@ -252,4 +262,6 @@ void __init cpu_init_topology(struct cpu
> */
> if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD || c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_HYGON)
> __amd_nodes_per_pkg = __max_die_per_package = tscan.amd_nodes_per_pkg;
> +
> + pr_info("NPP %u MDPP %u\n", __amd_nodes_per_pkg, __max_die_per_package);
> }