Re: [syzbot] [wireless?] WARNING in kcov_remote_start (3)

[Andrey Konovalov]

On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 12:45 PM Johannes Berg
<johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2024-03-28 at 04:00 -0700, syzbot wrote:
> >
> > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2400 at kernel/kcov.c:860 kcov_remote_start+0x549/0x7e0 kernel/kcov.c:860
>
> This is
>
>         /*
>          * Check that kcov_remote_start() is not called twice in background
>          * threads nor called by user tasks (with enabled kcov).
>          */
>         mode = READ_ONCE(t->kcov_mode);
>         if (WARN_ON(in_task() && kcov_mode_enabled(mode))) {
>                 local_unlock_irqrestore(&kcov_percpu_data.lock, flags);
>                 return;
>         }
>
> but I have no idea what that even means?
>
> > Workqueue: events_unbound cfg80211_wiphy_work
> > RIP: 0010:kcov_remote_start+0x549/0x7e0 kernel/kcov.c:860
> ...
> > Call Trace:
> >  <TASK>
> >  kcov_remote_start_common include/linux/kcov.h:48 [inline]
> >  ieee80211_iface_work+0x21f/0xf10 net/mac80211/iface.c:1654
> >  cfg80211_wiphy_work+0x221/0x260 net/wireless/core.c:437
> >  process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3218 [inline]
> >  process_scheduled_works+0xa2c/0x1830 kernel/workqueue.c:3299
> >  worker_thread+0x86d/0xd70 kernel/workqueue.c:3380
>
> It's a worker thread. Was this not intended to be called in threads?

I think the problem is that the KCOV annotations in the NFC code are
buggy: kcov_remote_stop() is never called if the loop in nci_rx_work()
exits on one of the breaks. With the recent addition of the nci_plen()
check, this started happening often. But breaks existed in the loop
before that too.

We need to move kcov_remote_stop() into the loop and call it every
time the loop exits.

Dmitry, could you PTAL and confirm this? You added the annotation for
NFC, AFAICS.

Thanks!