Re: [PATCH 4/6] drm/msm/adreno: Implement SMEM-based speed bin

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 4/6/24 05:23, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 10:41:32AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > On recent (SM8550+) Snapdragon platforms, the GPU speed bin data is
> > abstracted through SMEM, instead of being directly available in a fuse.
> >
> > Add support for SMEM-based speed binning, which includes getting
> > "feature code" and "product code" from said source and parsing them
> > to form something that lets us match OPPs against.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---

[...]

> > -	return nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
> > +	u32 fcode, pcode;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	/* Try reading the speedbin via a nvmem cell first */
> > +	ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
> > +	if (!ret && ret != -EINVAL)
>
> This is always false.

Right, a better condition would be (!ret || ret != EINVAL)..


> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = qcom_smem_get_feature_code(&fcode);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "Couldn't get feature code from SMEM!\n");
> > +		return ret;
>
> This brings in QCOM_SMEM dependency (which is not mentioned in the
> Kconfig). Please keep iMX5 hardware in mind, so the dependency should be
> optional. Respective functions should be stubbed in the header.

OK, I had this in mind early on, but forgot to actually impl it.

> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = qcom_smem_get_product_code(&pcode);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "Couldn't get product code from SMEM!\n");
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Don't consider fcode for external feature codes */
> > +	if (fcode <= SOCINFO_FC_EXT_RESERVE)
> > +		fcode = SOCINFO_FC_UNKNOWN;
> > +
> > +	*speedbin = FIELD_PREP(ADRENO_SKU_ID_PCODE, pcode) |
> > +		    FIELD_PREP(ADRENO_SKU_ID_FCODE, fcode);
>
> What about just asking the qcom_smem for the 'gpu_bin' and hiding gory
> details there? It almost feels that handling raw PCODE / FCODE here is
> too low-level and a subject to change depending on the socinfo format.

No, the FCODE & PCODE can be interpreted differently across consumers.

> > +
> > +	return ret;
> >   }
> >   
> >   int adreno_gpu_init(struct drm_device *drm, struct platform_device *pdev,
> > @@ -1098,9 +1129,9 @@ int adreno_gpu_init(struct drm_device *drm, struct platform_device *pdev,
> >   			devm_pm_opp_set_clkname(dev, "core");
> >   	}
> >   
> > -	if (adreno_read_speedbin(dev, &speedbin) || !speedbin)
> > +	if (adreno_read_speedbin(adreno_gpu, dev, &speedbin) || !speedbin)
> >   		speedbin = 0xffff;
> > -	adreno_gpu->speedbin = (uint16_t) (0xffff & speedbin);
>
> the &= 0xffff should probably go to the adreno_read_speedbin / nvmem
> case. WDYT?

Ok, I can keep it, though realistically if this ever does anything
useful, it likely means the dt is wrong

Konrad