Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] drivers/virt/acrn: fix PFNMAP PTE checks in acrn_vm_ram_map()

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed Apr 10 2024 - 16:13:08 EST


On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:55:25 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> We currently miss to handle various cases, resulting in a dangerous
> follow_pte() (previously follow_pfn()) usage.
>
> (1) We're not checking PTE write permissions.
>
> Maybe we should simply always require pte_write() like we do for
> pin_user_pages_fast(FOLL_WRITE)? Hard to tell, so let's check for
> ACRN_MEM_ACCESS_WRITE for now.
>
> (2) We're not rejecting refcounted pages.
>
> As we are not using MMU notifiers, messing with refcounted pages is
> dangerous and can result in use-after-free. Let's make sure to reject them.
>
> (3) We are only looking at the first PTE of a bigger range.
>
> We only lookup a single PTE, but memmap->len may span a larger area.
> Let's loop over all involved PTEs and make sure the PFN range is
> actually contiguous. Reject everything else: it couldn't have worked
> either way, and rather made use access PFNs we shouldn't be accessing.
>

This all sounds rather nasty and the maintainers of this driver may
choose to turn your fixes into something suitable for current mainline
and for -stable backporting.

If they choose to do this then please just go ahead. Once such a
change appear in linux-next the mm-unstable patch "virt: acrn: stop
using follow_pfn" will start generating rejects, which will be easy
enough to handle. Of they may choose to incorporate that change at the
same time. Here it is:


From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Subject: virt: acrn: stop using follow_pfn
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:45:40 +0800

Switch from follow_pfn to follow_pte so that we can get rid of follow_pfn.
Note that this doesn't fix any of the pre-existing raciness and lack of
permission checking in the code.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240324234542.2038726-1-hch@xxxxxx
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240324234542.2038726-2-hch@xxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Fei Li <fei1.li@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

drivers/virt/acrn/mm.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/virt/acrn/mm.c~virt-acrn-stop-using-follow_pfn
+++ a/drivers/virt/acrn/mm.c
@@ -172,18 +172,24 @@ int acrn_vm_ram_map(struct acrn_vm *vm,
mmap_read_lock(current->mm);
vma = vma_lookup(current->mm, memmap->vma_base);
if (vma && ((vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP) != 0)) {
+ spinlock_t *ptl;
+ pte_t *ptep;
+
if ((memmap->vma_base + memmap->len) > vma->vm_end) {
mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);
return -EINVAL;
}

- ret = follow_pfn(vma, memmap->vma_base, &pfn);
- mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);
+ ret = follow_pte(vma->vm_mm, memmap->vma_base, &ptep, &ptl);
if (ret < 0) {
+ mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);
dev_dbg(acrn_dev.this_device,
"Failed to lookup PFN at VMA:%pK.\n", (void *)memmap->vma_base);
return ret;
}
+ pfn = pte_pfn(ptep_get(ptep));
+ pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
+ mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);

return acrn_mm_region_add(vm, memmap->user_vm_pa,
PFN_PHYS(pfn), memmap->len,
_