Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs: *-regressions.rst: unify quoting, add missing word

[Jonathan Corbet]

"Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
<regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 28.03.24 20:29, Karel Balej wrote:
>> Quoting of the '"no regressions" rule' expression differs between
>> occurrences, sometimes being presented as '"no regressions rule"'. Unify
>> the quoting using the first form which seems semantically correct or is
>> at least used dominantly, albeit marginally.
>> 
>> One of the occurrences is obviously missing the 'rule' part -- add it.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Karel Balej <balejk@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thx for this:
>
> Reviewed-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I've applied this patch; part 2, it seems, is subject to further work so
I have not applied that one.

Thanks,

jon