Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] clk: hisilicon: rename hi3519 PLL registration function

From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Thu Apr 11 2024 - 03:54:04 EST


Quoting Yang Xiwen (2024-04-11 00:44:33)
> On 4/11/2024 2:52 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Yang Xiwen via B4 Relay (2024-02-24 08:56:09)
> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3559a.c b/drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3559a.c
> >> index ff4ca0edce06..77fa4203a428 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3559a.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3559a.c
> >> @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops hisi_clk_pll_ops = {
> >> .recalc_rate = clk_pll_recalc_rate,
> >> };
> >>
> >> -static void hisi_clk_register_pll(struct hi3559av100_pll_clock *clks,
> >> +static void _hisi_clk_register_pll(struct hi3559av100_pll_clock *clks,
> > Prefix it with hi3559a then to be SoC specific please. But this is also
> > static so I'm not sure why this patch is needed at all.
>
>
> it includes the header that marks this function non-static. Also the
> prototype is incompatible.

What is 'it'?

$ git grep hisi_clk_register_pll
drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3559a.c:static void hisi_clk_register_pll(struct hi3559av100_pll_clock *clks,
drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3559a.c: hisi_clk_register_pll(hi3559av100_pll_clks,