Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] serial: exar: add support for config/set single MPIO

[Parker Newman]

On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 13:20:41 +0300 (EEST)
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Apr 2024, parker@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > From: Parker Newman <pnewman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Adds support for configuring and setting a single MPIO
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Parker Newman <pnewman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_exar.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 88 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_exar.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_exar.c
> > index 49d690344e65..9915a99cb7c6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_exar.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_exar.c
> > @@ -305,6 +305,94 @@ static int exar_ee_read(struct exar8250 *priv, uint8_t ee_addr)
> >  	return data;
> >  }
> > 
> > +/**
> > + * exar_mpio_config() - Configure an EXar MPIO as input or output
> > + * @priv: Device's private structure
> > + * @mpio_num: MPIO number/offset to configure
> > + * @output: Configure as output if true, inout if false
> > + *
> > + * Configure a single MPIO as an input or output and disable trisate.  
> 
> tristate
> 
> > + * If configuring as output it is reccomended to set value with
> > + * exar_mpio_set prior to calling this function to ensure default state.  
> 
> Use () if talking about function.
> 
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on failure
> > + */
> > +static int exar_mpio_config(struct exar8250 *priv,
> > +			unsigned int mpio_num, bool output)
> > +{
> > +	uint8_t sel_reg; //MPIO Select register (input/output)
> > +	uint8_t tri_reg; //MPIO Tristate register
> > +	uint8_t value;
> > +	unsigned int bit;
> > +
> > +	if (mpio_num < 8) {
> > +		sel_reg = UART_EXAR_MPIOSEL_7_0;
> > +		tri_reg = UART_EXAR_MPIO3T_7_0;
> > +		bit = mpio_num;
> > +	} else if (mpio_num >= 8 && mpio_num < 16) {
> > +		sel_reg = UART_EXAR_MPIOSEL_15_8;
> > +		tri_reg = UART_EXAR_MPIO3T_15_8;
> > +		bit = mpio_num - 8;
> > +	} else {
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	//Disable MPIO pin tri-state
> > +	value = exar_read_reg(priv, tri_reg);
> > +	value &= ~(BIT(bit));  
> 
> Use more meaningful variable name than "bit", it could perhaps even avoid 
> the need to use the comment if the code is self-explanary with better 
> variable name.
> 
> > +	exar_write_reg(priv, tri_reg, value);
> > +
> > +	value = exar_read_reg(priv, sel_reg);
> > +	//Set MPIO as input (1) or output (0)  
> 
> Unnecessary comment.
> 
> > +	if (output)
> > +		value &= ~(BIT(bit));  
> 
> Unnecessary parenthesis.
> 
> > +	else
> > +		value |= BIT(bit);
> > +
> > +	exar_write_reg(priv, sel_reg, value);  
> 
> Don't leave empty line into RMW sequence.
> 
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +/**
> > + * exar_mpio_set() - Set an Exar MPIO output high or low
> > + * @priv: Device's private structure
> > + * @mpio_num: MPIO number/offset to set
> > + * @high: Set MPIO high if true, low if false
> > + *
> > + * Set a single MPIO high or low. exar_mpio_config must also be called
> > + * to configure the pin as an output.
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on failure
> > + */
> > +static int exar_mpio_set(struct exar8250 *priv,
> > +		unsigned int mpio_num, bool high)
> > +{
> > +	uint8_t reg;
> > +	uint8_t value;
> > +	unsigned int bit;
> > +
> > +	if (mpio_num < 8) {
> > +		reg = UART_EXAR_MPIOSEL_7_0;
> > +		bit = mpio_num;
> > +	} else if (mpio_num >= 8 && mpio_num < 16) {
> > +		reg = UART_EXAR_MPIOSEL_15_8;
> > +		bit = mpio_num - 8;
> > +	} else {
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	value = exar_read_reg(priv, reg);
> > +
> > +	if (high)
> > +		value |= BIT(bit);
> > +	else
> > +		value &= ~(BIT(bit));  
> 
> Extra parenthesis.
> 
> > +
> > +	exar_write_reg(priv, reg, value);  
> 
> Again, I'd put this kind of simple RMW sequence without newlines.
> 
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}  

I will fix above. 

> There are zero users of these functions so I couldn't review if two 
> functions are really needed, or if the difference could be simply handled 
> using a boolean parameter.
> 

The functions are used by code in other patches in this series. 

I kept exar_mpio_set() and exar_mpio_config() separate because we plan on
adding support for other features in the future that require reading and 
writing MPIO. 

Thanks,
-Parker