Re: [patch V2 12/50] posix-cpu-timers: Replace old expiry retrieval in posix_cpu_timer_set()

From: Anna-Maria Behnsen
Date: Mon Apr 15 2024 - 10:03:24 EST

Next message: Anna-Maria Behnsen: "Re: [patch V2 13/50] posix-cpu-timers: Do not arm SIGEV_NONE timers"
Previous message: Chao Yu: "Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: zone: don't block IO if there is remained open zone"
In reply to: Thomas Gleixner: "[patch V2 12/50] posix-cpu-timers: Replace old expiry retrieval in posix_cpu_timer_set()"
Next in thread: Thomas Gleixner: "[patch V2 13/50] posix-cpu-timers: Do not arm SIGEV_NONE timers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Reuse the split out __posix_cpu_timer_get() function which does already the
> right thing.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Next message: Anna-Maria Behnsen: "Re: [patch V2 13/50] posix-cpu-timers: Do not arm SIGEV_NONE timers"
Previous message: Chao Yu: "Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: zone: don't block IO if there is remained open zone"
In reply to: Thomas Gleixner: "[patch V2 12/50] posix-cpu-timers: Replace old expiry retrieval in posix_cpu_timer_set()"
Next in thread: Thomas Gleixner: "[patch V2 13/50] posix-cpu-timers: Do not arm SIGEV_NONE timers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]