Re: [PATCH v4 24/25] media:i2c: imx258: Use v4l2_link_freq_to_bitmap helper

From: Tommaso Merciai
Date: Mon Apr 15 2024 - 12:32:50 EST


On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:27:28AM -0600, Luis Garcia wrote:
> On 4/15/24 09:18, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> > Hi Luis,
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 02:35:02PM -0600, git@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> From: Luis Garcia <git@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Use the v4l2_link_freq_to_bitmap() helper to figure out which
> >> driver-supported link freq can be used on a given system.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Luis Garcia <git@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c
> >> index 5de71cb7c1ae..65846dff775e 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c
> >> @@ -693,6 +693,7 @@ struct imx258 {
> >> /* Current mode */
> >> const struct imx258_mode *cur_mode;
> >>
> >> + unsigned long link_freq_bitmap;
> >> const struct imx258_link_freq_config *link_freq_configs;
> >> const s64 *link_freq_menu_items;
> >> unsigned int lane_mode_idx;
> >> @@ -1552,6 +1553,17 @@ static int imx258_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >>
> >> + ret = v4l2_link_freq_to_bitmap(&client->dev,
> >> + ep.link_frequencies,
> >> + ep.nr_of_link_frequencies,
> >> + imx258->link_freq_menu_items,
> >> + ARRAY_SIZE(link_freq_menu_items_19_2),
> >> + &imx258->link_freq_bitmap);
> >> + if (ret) {
> >> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Link frequency not supported\n");
> >> + goto error_endpoint_free;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> /* Get number of data lanes */
> >> switch (ep.bus.mipi_csi2.num_data_lanes) {
> >> case 2:
> >
> > Looks good to me.
> >
> > ps:
> > Maybe a good plan for the future would be to use: dev_err_probe
> > (instead of dev_err into probe function)
> >
> > But this I think is somenthing for next improvements. :)
> >
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Tommaso
> >
>
> Perfect, can i go ahead and add in your reviewed by looks like
> you didnt add it here.

Yep sorry I miss that. :'(

Thanks & Regards,
Tommaso

>
> >> --
> >> 2.44.0
> >>
> >>
>