[syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] possible deadlock in sock_hash_update_common

From: syzbot
Date: Mon Apr 15 2024 - 13:08:32 EST

Next message: Mike Rapoport: "Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] x86/module: perpare module loading for ROX allocations of text"
Previous message: Sean Christopherson: "Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: delete .change_pte MMU notifier callback"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: f99c5f563c17 Merge tag 'nf-24-03-21' of git://git.kernel.o..
git tree: net
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=131e1a57180000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=6fb1be60a193d440
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=0b95946cd0588e2ad0f5
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/65d3f3eb786e/disk-f99c5f56.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/799cf7f28ff8/vmlinux-f99c5f56.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/ab26c60c3845/bzImage-f99c5f56.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+0b95946cd0588e2ad0f5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.8.0-syzkaller-05271-gf99c5f563c17 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.0/6160 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88801f90d290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
ffff88801f90d290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_add_link net/core/sock_map.c:134 [inline]
ffff88801f90d290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_hash_update_common+0x624/0xa30 net/core/sock_map.c:1023

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88802b942868 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
ffff88802b942868 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sock_hash_update_common+0x20c/0xa30 net/core/sock_map.c:1007

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+.-.}-{2:2}:
lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
sock_hash_delete_elem+0xb0/0x300 net/core/sock_map.c:939
0xffffffffa0001da2
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1234 [inline]
__bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:657 [inline]
bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:664 [inline]
__bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2381 [inline]
bpf_trace_run2+0x204/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420
trace_kfree include/trace/events/kmem.h:94 [inline]
kfree+0x291/0x380 mm/slub.c:4396
sk_psock_free_link include/linux/skmsg.h:421 [inline]
sock_map_del_link net/core/sock_map.c:158 [inline]
sock_map_unref+0x3ac/0x5e0 net/core/sock_map.c:180
__sock_map_delete net/core/sock_map.c:420 [inline]
sock_map_delete_elem+0xc0/0x140 net/core/sock_map.c:446
0xffffffffa0001e0a
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1234 [inline]
__bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:657 [inline]
bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:664 [inline]
__bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2381 [inline]
bpf_trace_run2+0x204/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420
trace_fdb_delete include/trace/events/bridge.h:69 [inline]
fdb_delete+0x117e/0x11f0 net/bridge/br_fdb.c:321
br_fdb_changeaddr+0x218/0x420 net/bridge/br_fdb.c:476
br_device_event+0x529/0x970 net/bridge/br.c:79
notifier_call_chain+0x18f/0x3b0 kernel/notifier.c:93
call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:1988 [inline]
call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2002 [inline]
dev_set_mac_address+0x3d9/0x510 net/core/dev.c:8949
dev_set_mac_address_user+0x31/0x50 net/core/dev.c:8963
dev_ifsioc+0xbd9/0xe70 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:542
dev_ioctl+0x719/0x1340 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:787
sock_do_ioctl+0x240/0x460 net/socket.c:1236
sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890
do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75

-> #0 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
__lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
sock_map_add_link net/core/sock_map.c:134 [inline]
sock_hash_update_common+0x624/0xa30 net/core/sock_map.c:1023
sock_map_update_elem_sys+0x5a4/0x910 net/core/sock_map.c:581
map_update_elem+0x53a/0x6f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1641
__sys_bpf+0x76f/0x810 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5619
__do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5738 [inline]
__se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736 [inline]
__x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736
do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75

other info that might help us debug this:

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock);
lock(&psock->link_lock);
lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock);
lock(&psock->link_lock);

*** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by syz-executor.0/6160:
#0: ffff88807c9f5a58 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1671 [inline]
#0: ffff88807c9f5a58 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sock_map_sk_acquire net/core/sock_map.c:117 [inline]
#0: ffff88807c9f5a58 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sock_map_update_elem_sys+0x1cc/0x910 net/core/sock_map.c:575
#1: ffffffff8e131920 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8e131920 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8e131920 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: sock_map_sk_acquire net/core/sock_map.c:118 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8e131920 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: sock_map_update_elem_sys+0x1d8/0x910 net/core/sock_map.c:575
#2: ffff88802b942868 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
#2: ffff88802b942868 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sock_hash_update_common+0x20c/0xa30 net/core/sock_map.c:1007

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 6160 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-05271-gf99c5f563c17 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2e0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
__lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
sock_map_add_link net/core/sock_map.c:134 [inline]
sock_hash_update_common+0x624/0xa30 net/core/sock_map.c:1023
sock_map_update_elem_sys+0x5a4/0x910 net/core/sock_map.c:581
map_update_elem+0x53a/0x6f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1641
__sys_bpf+0x76f/0x810 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5619
__do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5738 [inline]
__se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736 [inline]
__x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736
do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
RIP: 0033:0x7f87b227de69
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f87b304a0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f87b23abf80 RCX: 00007f87b227de69
RDX: 0000000000000020 RSI: 00000000200005c0 RDI: 0000000000000002
RBP: 00007f87b22ca47a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f87b23abf80 R15: 00007ffd6d15d8b8
</TASK>

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

Next message: Mike Rapoport: "Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] x86/module: perpare module loading for ROX allocations of text"
Previous message: Sean Christopherson: "Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: delete .change_pte MMU notifier callback"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]