Re: [PATCH v9 00/14] x86: Support Key Locker

From: Chang S. Bae
Date: Mon Apr 15 2024 - 18:58:58 EST

Next message: Sean Christopherson: "Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] KVM: x86: Always populate L1 GPA for KVM_MAP_MEMORY"
Previous message: Stephen Rothwell: "linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the sysctl tree"
In reply to: Eric Biggers: "Re: [PATCH v9 00/14] x86: Support Key Locker"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 4/15/2024 3:54 PM, Eric Biggers wrote:

Sure, you could still use VEX-coded 128-bit instructions for everything other
than the actual AES (for example, the XTS tweak computation) though, right?
They're a bit more convenient to work with since they are non-destructive.

Right.

Thanks,
Chang

Next message: Sean Christopherson: "Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] KVM: x86: Always populate L1 GPA for KVM_MAP_MEMORY"
Previous message: Stephen Rothwell: "linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the sysctl tree"
In reply to: Eric Biggers: "Re: [PATCH v9 00/14] x86: Support Key Locker"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]