[PATCH v2 2/7] irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1: Avoid explicit cpumask allocation on stack
From: Dawei Li
Date: Tue Apr 16 2024 - 04:56:41 EST
In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
stack space and make stack overflows more likely.
Use cpumask_first_and_and() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on
the stack.
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c
index eb02d203c963..90daa274ef23 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c
@@ -192,14 +192,10 @@ static int bcm6345_l1_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
u32 mask = BIT(d->hwirq % IRQS_PER_WORD);
unsigned int old_cpu = cpu_for_irq(intc, d);
unsigned int new_cpu;
- struct cpumask valid;
unsigned long flags;
bool enabled;
- if (!cpumask_and(&valid, &intc->cpumask, dest))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- new_cpu = cpumask_any_and(&valid, cpu_online_mask);
+ new_cpu = cpumask_first_and_and(&intc->cpumask, dest, cpu_online_mask);
if (new_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
return -EINVAL;
--
2.27.0