On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:10:55PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
This memory barrier is not needed and not documented so simply remove
it.
This looks like it should be patch 2 in the series, not patch 1, as it
is cleanup rather than a fix that needs backporting.
Suggested-by: Andrea Parri <andrea@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
index 37e87fdcf6a0..0b5c16dfe3f4 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
@@ -239,7 +239,6 @@ static int patch_text_cb(void *data)
} else {
while (atomic_read(&patch->cpu_count) <= num_online_cpus())
cpu_relax();
- smp_mb();
}
return ret;
--
2.39.2
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv