Sorry, I misspell. I mean whether it is reasonable.
On 2024/4/17 10:59, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 10:50:10AM +0800, Youling Tang wrote:The flags also with the space after "=". Is it reseonable?
Hi, Kent
On 17/04/2024 10:20, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 09:54:48AM +0800, Youling Tang wrote:
From: Youling Tang <tangyouling@xxxxxxxxxx>
Before patch:
```
#cat btrees/inodes/keys
u64s 17 type inode_v3 0:4096:U32_MAX len 0 ver 0: mode=40755
flags= (16300000)
```
After patch:
```
#cat btrees/inodes/keys
u64s 17 type inode_v3 0:4096:U32_MAX len 0 ver 0:
mode=40755
flags= (16300000)
This would print a newline for keys that don't have a value...The original intention was to make the display of the printed content in
'__bch2_inode_unpacked_to_text ()' consistent, without considering other
callbacks.
Or just modify it in the following way?
Yeah, that's better
Do it off my master branch though, there's some printbuf imprevements in
there.
https://evilpiepirate.org/git/bcachefs.git
--- a/fs/bcachefs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/inode.c
@@ -534,6 +534,8 @@ int bch2_inode_v3_invalid(struct bch_fs *c, struct
bkey_s_c k,
static void __bch2_inode_unpacked_to_text(struct printbuf *out,
struct bch_inode_unpacked *inode)
{
+ prt_newline(out);
+
printbuf_indent_add(out, 2);
prt_printf(out, "mode=%o", inode->bi_mode);
prt_newline(out);
Thanks,
Youling.