Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: PCI: altera: Convert to YAML

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Wed Apr 17 2024 - 09:34:48 EST


On 16/04/2024 16:32, matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>> Why Hip is the first? Old binding suggested it to be the last entry. It
>> would also make binding easier, as you describe reg and reg-names in
>> top-level and just limit them with min/maxItems.
>>
>> Does anything depend on different order (Hip as first)?
>
> I don't think the order really matters. So Hip could go last, and it makes

The order matters, it is the ABI.

Best regards,
Krzysztof