Re: [PATCH V3 3/5] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Resize GIC Redistributor register region

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 06:58:54PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Resize the GICR register region as it currently seeps into the CPU Control
> Processor mailbox RX region.
> 

Not that anyone is running a stable kernel here, but please make a habit
of adding Fixes: tags when correcting previous mistakes.

> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> v2:
> * Pickup Rb from Dimitry.
> 
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
> index f5a3b39ae70e..28f65296781d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
> @@ -4949,7 +4949,7 @@ apps_smmu: iommu@15000000 {
>  		intc: interrupt-controller@17000000 {
>  			compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
>  			reg = <0 0x17000000 0 0x10000>,     /* GICD */
> -			      <0 0x17080000 0 0x480000>;    /* GICR * 12 */
> +			      <0 0x17080000 0 0x380000>;    /* GICR * 12 */
>  

The 12th GICR ends a bit before that, and per your commit message you're
just nudging it down to get this range out of the say of your other
range - rather than giving it a proper value.

Wouldn't 0x300000 be a better value here? Or am I perhaps missing
something in the difference? If so, I'd like the commit message to state
what, so someone doesn't get excited and correct/break it later.

Regards,
Bjorn

>  			interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>