[Some people who received this message don't often get email from xiujianfeng@xxxxxxxxxx. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]It's helpful to know why this patch not need, thank you.
Hi,
I found a discussion about this change in the email thread bellow, and
hope it helps you.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/YwMwlMv%2FtK3sRXbB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/#t
On 2024/4/9 10:18, Huan Yang wrote:
The current cgroups output format is based on tabs, which
may cause misalignment of output information.
Using placeholder formatting can make the output information
more readable.
Signed-off-by: Huan Yang <link@xxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
index 520a11cb12f4..c082a78f4c22 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
@@ -669,15 +669,16 @@ int proc_cgroupstats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
struct cgroup_subsys *ss;
int i;
- seq_puts(m, "#subsys_name\thierarchy\tnum_cgroups\tenabled\n");
+ seq_printf(m, "%16s %16s %16s %16s\n", "#subsys_name", "hierarchy",
+ "num_cgroups", "enabled");
/*
* Grab the subsystems state racily. No need to add avenue to
* cgroup_mutex contention.
*/
for_each_subsys(ss, i)
- seq_printf(m, "%s\t%d\t%d\t%d\n",
- ss->legacy_name, ss->root->hierarchy_id,
+ seq_printf(m, "%16s %16d %16d %16d\n", ss->legacy_name,
+ ss->root->hierarchy_id,
atomic_read(&ss->root->nr_cgrps),
cgroup_ssid_enabled(i));