Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)

[Jérôme Carretero]

Hi Sasha,


Thank you, sorry for the delay but I coudln't reboot.

Adding Greg KH because I don't know if stable will receive my e-mail
(not subscribed) but the regression was integrated in stable:
 commit 0a4e3c2d976aa4dd38951afd6267f74ef3fade0e
so they should get the fix ASAP too.


Tested-by: Jérôme Carretero <cJ-ko@xxxxxxxxxxx>


Best regards,

-- 
Jérôme

On Thu, 2024-04-18 at 06:44 +0300, Sasha Neftin wrote:
> On 17/04/2024 21:46, Jérôme Carretero wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > 
> > I opened https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218740 because
> > I'm
> > not quite sure the culprit is e1000e or some timer stuff.
> 
> Hello Jérôme,
> 
> You hit on regression introduced by 6dbdd4de0362 (used the wrong
> timer 
> during code running in atomic contexts)
> Please, incorporate 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/intel-wired-lan/patch/202404171903203159360-1-vitaly.lifshits@xxxxxxxxx/
>  
> in your latest kernel.
> 
> Thanks,
> sasha
> 
> > 
> > I just verified that this happens on the latest master.
> > 
> > 
> > Let me know if I can (quickly) help,
> > 
> > 
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part