Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] PCI: qcom: Add support for IPQ9574

[mr . nuke . me]

Hi Mani.

On 4/17/24 02:06, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 03:07:02PM -0500, mr.nuke.me@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > On 4/15/24 15:04, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 21:22, Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Add support for the PCIe on IPQ9574. The main difference from ipq6018
> > > > is that the "iface" clock is not necessarry. Add a special case in
> > > > qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_9_0() to handle this.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >    drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 13 +++++++++----
> > > >    1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > > > index 14772edcf0d3..10560d6d6336 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > > > @@ -1101,15 +1101,19 @@ static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> > > >           struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_9_0 *res = &pcie->res.v2_9_0;
> > > >           struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> > > >           struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> > > > -       int ret;
> > > > +       int ret, num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(res->clks) - 1;
> > > >
> > > > -       res->clks[0].id = "iface";
> > > > +       res->clks[0].id = "rchng";
> > > >           res->clks[1].id = "axi_m";
> > > >           res->clks[2].id = "axi_s";
> > > >           res->clks[3].id = "axi_bridge";
> > > > -       res->clks[4].id = "rchng";
> > > >
> > > > -       ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, ARRAY_SIZE(res->clks), res->clks);
> > > > +       if (!of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,pcie-ipq9574")) {
> > > > +               res->clks[4].id = "iface";
> > > > +               num_clks++;
> > > > +       }
> > > > +
> > > > +       ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, num_clks, res->clks);
> > >
> > > Just use devm_clk_bulk_get_optional() here.
> >
> > Thank you! I wasn't sure if this was the correct solution here. I will get
> > this updated in v4.
>
> Please rebase on top of [1] and mention the dependency in cover letter.

I am very hesitant to depend on another patch series. Is it okay if I 
include your patch in v4 of this series?

Alex