Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] kbuild: Avoid weak external linkage where possible

[Ard Biesheuvel]

On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 at 14:32, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 4:57 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 16:40, <patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello:
> > >
> > > This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
> > > by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 18:20:42 +0200 you wrote:
> > > > From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Weak external linkage is intended for cases where a symbol reference
> > > > can remain unsatisfied in the final link. Taking the address of such a
> > > > symbol should yield NULL if the reference was not satisfied.
> > > >
> > > > Given that ordinary RIP or PC relative references cannot produce NULL,
> > > > some kind of indirection is always needed in such cases, and in position
> > > > independent code, this results in a GOT entry. In ordinary code, it is
> > > > arch specific but amounts to the same thing.
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > >
> > > Here is the summary with links:
> > >   - [v4,1/3] kallsyms: Avoid weak references for kallsyms symbols
> > >     (no matching commit)
> > >   - [v4,2/3] vmlinux: Avoid weak reference to notes section
> > >     (no matching commit)
> > >   - [v4,3/3] btf: Avoid weak external references
> > >     https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/fc5eb4a84e4c
> > >
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Masahiro, could you pick up patches #1 and #2 please?
> >
>
>
> I do not like PROVIDE() because it potentially shifts
> a build error (i.e. link error) into
> a run-time error, which is usually more difficult to debug
> than build error.
>
> If someone references the kallsyms_* symbols
> when CONFIG_KALLSYMS=n, it is likely a mistake.
> In general, it should be reported as a link error.
>

OK, so the PROVIDE() should be conditional on CONFIG_KALLSYM=y. I can fix that.

> With PROVIDE() added, we will never detect it
> at a build time.
>
> Do you want me to pick up 1/3?
>

???