Re: [PATCH cmpxchg 13/14] xtensa: Emulate one-byte cmpxchg

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 10:02:47AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 7:14 AM Yujie Liu <yujie.liu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 04:21:46PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:06:21AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 7:49 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > Use the new cmpxchg_emu_u8() to emulate one-byte cmpxchg() on xtensa.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ paulmck: Apply kernel test robot feedback. ]
> > > > > [ paulmck: Drop two-byte support per Arnd Bergmann feedback. ]
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your patch!
> > > >
> > > > > --- a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> > > > > +++ b/arch/xtensa/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> > > > > @@ -74,6 +75,7 @@ static __inline__ unsigned long
> > > > >  __cmpxchg(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old, unsigned long new, int size)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >         switch (size) {
> > > > > +       case 1:  return cmpxchg_emu_u8((volatile u8 *)ptr, old, new);
> > > >
> > > > The cast is not needed.
> > >
> > > In both cases, kernel test robot yelled at me when it was not present.
> > >
> > > Happy to resubmit without it, though, if that is a yell that I should
> > > have ignored.
> >
> > FYI, kernel test robot did yell some reports on various architectures such as:
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403292321.T55etywH-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404040526.GVzaL2io-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
> > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404022106.mYwpypit-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > In brief, there were mainly three types of issues:
> >
> > * The cmpxchg-emu.h header is missing
> > * The parameters of cmpxchg_emu_u8 need to be cast to corresponding types
> > * The return value of cmpxchg_emu_u8 needs to be cast to the "ret" type
> >
> > As for this specific case of xtensa arch, the compiler doesn't warn
> > regardless of whether there is an explicit cast for "ptr" or not.
> > The "ptr" being passed in is "void *", and it seems that a "void *"
> > pointer can be automatically cast to any other type of pointer, so it
> > is not necessary to have an explicit cast of "u8 *".
> >
> > As for the implementations of other architectures that don't pass the
> > "ptr" as "void *" (such as a macro implementation), the explicit cast to
> > "u8 *" may still be required.
> 
> Exactly.  On sh and xtensa, the original pointer is of type
> "volatile void *", so no cast is needed.
> On E.g. arc, the original pointer is of type "volatile __typeof__(ptr) _p_",
> which is not always compatible with "volatile u8 *".

Very good, and thank you both!  I will spin updated patches and send
them out early this coming week.

							Thanx, Paul

> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 
> -- 
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds