Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] kbuild: Avoid weak external linkage where possible

[Masahiro Yamada]

On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 11:00 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 at 15:56, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 at 15:42, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 9:35 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 at 14:32, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 4:57 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 16:40, <patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
> > > > > > > by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 18:20:42 +0200 you wrote:
> > > > > > > > From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Weak external linkage is intended for cases where a symbol reference
> > > > > > > > can remain unsatisfied in the final link. Taking the address of such a
> > > > > > > > symbol should yield NULL if the reference was not satisfied.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Given that ordinary RIP or PC relative references cannot produce NULL,
> > > > > > > > some kind of indirection is always needed in such cases, and in position
> > > > > > > > independent code, this results in a GOT entry. In ordinary code, it is
> > > > > > > > arch specific but amounts to the same thing.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [...]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Here is the summary with links:
> > > > > > >   - [v4,1/3] kallsyms: Avoid weak references for kallsyms symbols
> > > > > > >     (no matching commit)
> > > > > > >   - [v4,2/3] vmlinux: Avoid weak reference to notes section
> > > > > > >     (no matching commit)
> > > > > > >   - [v4,3/3] btf: Avoid weak external references
> > > > > > >     https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/fc5eb4a84e4c
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Masahiro, could you pick up patches #1 and #2 please?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I do not like PROVIDE() because it potentially shifts
> > > > > a build error (i.e. link error) into
> > > > > a run-time error, which is usually more difficult to debug
> > > > > than build error.
> > > > >
> > > > > If someone references the kallsyms_* symbols
> > > > > when CONFIG_KALLSYMS=n, it is likely a mistake.
> > > > > In general, it should be reported as a link error.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > OK, so the PROVIDE() should be conditional on CONFIG_KALLSYM=y. I can fix that.
> > >
> > >
> > > You may need to take care of the dependency
> > > between CONFIG_KALLSYMS and CONFIG_VMCORE_INFO
> > > because kernel/vmcore_info.c has references
> > > to the kallsyms_* symbols.
> > >
> > > (I am still not a big fan of PROVIDE() though)
> > >
> >
> >
> > OK, how about we use weak definitions (as opposed to weak references)
> > in kernel/kallsyms.c, which will get superseded by the actual ones in
> > the second linker pass.
> >
> > The only difference is that we will use some space in the binary for
> > the weak definitions that are never used in the final build.


I am fine if that fixes the issue.


"git grep __weak" shows a bunch of weak definitions.




> Btw those references in kernel/vmcore_info.c are guarded by #ifdef
> CONFIG_KALLSYMS=y too.

Ah, OK.
Then, this is not an issue.


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada