Re: [PATCH net-next] net/mlx5e: flower: check for unsupported control flags

From: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
Date: Mon Apr 22 2024 - 04:32:09 EST


Hi Jianbo,

Thank you for the review.

On 4/22/24 6:58 AM, Jianbo Liu wrote:
On Wed, 2024-04-17 at 13:51 +0000, Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen wrote:
Use flow_rule_is_supp_control_flags() to reject filters with
unsupported control flags.

In case any unsupported control flags are masked,
flow_rule_is_supp_control_flags() sets a NL extended
error message, and we return -EOPNOTSUPP.

Only compile-tested.

Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
index aeb32cb27182..5019280cfcdd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
@@ -2819,6 +2819,11 @@ static int __parse_cls_flower(struct
mlx5e_priv *priv,
                        else
                                *match_level = MLX5_MATCH_L3;
                }
+
+               if
(!flow_rule_is_supp_control_flags(FLOW_DIS_IS_FRAGMENT |
+
FLOW_DIS_FIRST_FRAG,

We reject FLOW_DIS_FIRST_FRAG at several lines above. I think you can
remove those lines and add FLOW_DIS_IS_FRAGMENT as the only supported
flag here.

Sure, I can do that. I originally kept it, since the error message was
more user-friendly.


--
Best regards
Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
Network Engineer
Fiberby - AS42541