Re: [PATCH] Clarify risc-v hwprobe RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_* docs.

[Charlie Jenkins]

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 12:18:25PM -0700, enh wrote:
> These only tell you about scalar accesses, not vector accesses.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Elliott Hughes <enh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst | 16 ++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> index b2bcc9eed9aa..239be63f5089 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> @@ -192,21 +192,21 @@ The following keys are defined:
>    information about the selected set of processors.
> 
>    * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN`: The performance of misaligned
> -    accesses is unknown.
> +    scalar accesses is unknown.
> 
> -  * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED`: Misaligned accesses are
> +  * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED`: Misaligned scalar
> accesses are
>      emulated via software, either in or below the kernel.  These accesses are
>      always extremely slow.
> 
> -  * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SLOW`: Misaligned accesses are slower
> -    than equivalent byte accesses.  Misaligned accesses may be supported
> +  * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SLOW`: Misaligned scalar accesses are
> +    slower than equivalent byte accesses.  Misaligned accesses may be supported
>      directly in hardware, or trapped and emulated by software.
> 
> -  * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST`: Misaligned accesses are faster
> -    than equivalent byte accesses.
> +  * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST`: Misaligned scalar accesses are
> +    faster than equivalent byte accesses.
> 
> -  * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED`: Misaligned accesses are
> -    not supported at all and will generate a misaligned address fault.
> +  * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED`: Misaligned scalar accesses
> +    are not supported at all and will generate a misaligned address fault.
> 
>  * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE`: An unsigned int which
>    represents the size of the Zicboz block in bytes.
> -- 
> 2.44.0.478.gd926399ef9-goog
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

- Charlie