Re: [PATCH v7 06/16] ACPI: processor: Register deferred CPUs from acpi_processor_get_info()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 3:57 PM Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>
>
> The arm64 specific arch_register_cpu() call may defer CPU registration
> until the ACPI interpreter is available and the _STA method can
> be evaluated.
>
> If this occurs, then a second attempt is made in
> acpi_processor_get_info(). Note that the arm64 specific call has
> not yet been added so for now this will be called for the original
> hotplug case.
>
> For architectures that do not defer until the ACPI Processor
> driver loads (e.g. x86), for initially present CPUs there will
> already be a CPU device. If present do not try to register again.
>
> Systems can still be booted with 'acpi=off', or not include an
> ACPI description at all as in these cases arch_register_cpu()
> will not have deferred registration when first called.
>
> This moves the CPU register logic back to a subsys_initcall(),
> while the memory nodes will have been registered earlier.
> Note this is where the call was prior to the cleanup series so
> there should be no side effects of moving it back again for this
> specific case.
>
> [PATCH 00/21] Initial cleanups for vCPU HP.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZVyz%2FVe5pPu8AWoA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> commit 5b95f94c3b9f ("x86/topology: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES")
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri <vishnu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Joanthan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v7: Simplify the logic on whether to hotadd the CPU.
>     This path can only be reached either for coldplug in which
>     case all we care about is has register_cpu() already been
>     called (identifying deferred), or hotplug in which case
>     whether register_cpu() has been called is also sufficient.
>     Checks on _STA related elements or the validity of the ID
>     are no longer necessary here due to similar checks having
>     moved elsewhere in the path.
> v6: Squash the two paths for conventional CPU Hotplug and arm64
>     vCPU HP.
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> index 127ae8dcb787..4e65011e706c 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> @@ -350,14 +350,14 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
>         }
>
>         /*
> -        *  Extra Processor objects may be enumerated on MP systems with
> -        *  less than the max # of CPUs. They should be ignored _iff
> -        *  they are physically not present.
> -        *
> -        *  NOTE: Even if the processor has a cpuid, it may not be present
> -        *  because cpuid <-> apicid mapping is persistent now.
> +        *  This code is not called unless we know the CPU is present and
> +        *  enabled. The two paths are:
> +        *  a) Initially present CPUs on architectures that do not defer
> +        *     their arch_register_cpu() calls until this point.
> +        *  b) Hotplugged CPUs (enabled bit in _STA has transitioned from not
> +        *     enabled to enabled)
>          */
> -       if (invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) || !cpu_present(pr->id)) {
> +       if (!get_cpu_device(pr->id)) {
>                 ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr, device);

Yes, this is what I thought it should boil down to, so

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>

>
>                 if (ret)
> --
> 2.39.2
>