[PATCH v2] x86/e820: apply 'mem=' boot command while reserving memory using boot_params
From: Byungchul Park
Date: Tue Apr 23 2024 - 20:55:25 EST
When a user specifies 'mem=' boot command, it's expected to limit the
maximum address of usable memory for the kernel no matter what the
memory map source is. However, 'mem=' boot command doesn't work since
it doesn't respect it when reserving memory using boot_params.
Applied the restriction when reserving memory using boot_params. While
at it, renamed mem_size to a more specific name, boot_mem_limit.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@xxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
index 6f1b379e3b38..e3f716128caf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
@@ -880,11 +880,11 @@ static void __init early_panic(char *msg)
static int userdef __initdata;
+static u64 boot_mem_limit;
+
/* The "mem=nopentium" boot option disables 4MB page tables on 32-bit kernels: */
static int __init parse_memopt(char *p)
{
- u64 mem_size;
-
if (!p)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -899,16 +899,16 @@ static int __init parse_memopt(char *p)
}
userdef = 1;
- mem_size = memparse(p, &p);
+ boot_mem_limit = memparse(p, &p);
/* Don't remove all memory when getting "mem={invalid}" parameter: */
- if (mem_size == 0)
+ if (boot_mem_limit == 0)
return -EINVAL;
- e820__range_remove(mem_size, ULLONG_MAX - mem_size, E820_TYPE_RAM, 1);
+ e820__range_remove(boot_mem_limit, ULLONG_MAX - boot_mem_limit, E820_TYPE_RAM, 1);
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
- max_mem_size = mem_size;
+ max_mem_size = boot_mem_limit;
#endif
return 0;
@@ -1036,6 +1036,9 @@ void __init e820__reserve_setup_data(void)
early_memunmap(data, len);
}
+ if (boot_mem_limit)
+ e820__range_remove(boot_mem_limit, ULLONG_MAX - boot_mem_limit,
+ E820_TYPE_RESERVED_KERN, 1);
e820__update_table(e820_table);
pr_info("extended physical RAM map:\n");
--
2.17.1