Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 13/16] bpf: wq: add bpf_wq_set_callback_impl
From: Alexei Starovoitov
Date: Tue Apr 23 2024 - 22:56:36 EST
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 2:10 AM Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> @@ -11018,6 +11027,7 @@ enum special_kfunc_type {
> KF_bpf_percpu_obj_drop_impl,
> KF_bpf_throw,
> KF_bpf_iter_css_task_new,
> + KF_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl,
> };
>
> BTF_SET_START(special_kfunc_set)
> @@ -11044,6 +11054,7 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_throw)
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS
> BTF_ID(func, bpf_iter_css_task_new)
> #endif
> +BTF_ID(func, bpf_wq_set_callback_impl)
> BTF_SET_END(special_kfunc_set)
>
> BTF_ID_LIST(special_kfunc_list)
> @@ -11074,6 +11085,7 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_iter_css_task_new)
> #else
> BTF_ID_UNUSED
> #endif
> +BTF_ID(func, bpf_wq_set_callback_impl)
This is broken on !CONFIG_CGROUPS.
KF_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl in enum special_kfunc_type won't
match special_kfunc_list.
I moved this line up while applying.
>
> static bool is_kfunc_ret_null(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta)
> {
> @@ -11402,12 +11414,28 @@ static bool is_sync_callback_calling_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
> return btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_add_impl];
> }
>
> +static bool is_async_callback_calling_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
> +{
> + return btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl];
> +}
> +
> static bool is_bpf_throw_kfunc(struct bpf_insn *insn)
> {
> return bpf_pseudo_kfunc_call(insn) && insn->off == 0 &&
> insn->imm == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_throw];
> }
>
> +static bool is_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
> +{
> + return btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl];
> +}
> +
> +static bool is_callback_calling_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
> +{
> + return is_sync_callback_calling_kfunc(btf_id) ||
> + is_async_callback_calling_kfunc(btf_id);
> +}
> +
> static bool is_rbtree_lock_required_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
> {
> return is_bpf_rbtree_api_kfunc(btf_id);
> @@ -12219,6 +12247,16 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
> }
> }
>
> + if (is_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl_kfunc(meta.func_id)) {
> + err = push_callback_call(env, insn, insn_idx, meta.subprogno,
> + set_timer_callback_state);
> + if (err) {
> + verbose(env, "kfunc %s#%d failed callback verification\n",
> + func_name, meta.func_id);
> + return err;
> + }
> + }
> +
> rcu_lock = is_kfunc_bpf_rcu_read_lock(&meta);
> rcu_unlock = is_kfunc_bpf_rcu_read_unlock(&meta);
>
> @@ -16982,6 +17020,9 @@ static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> if (old->active_rcu_lock != cur->active_rcu_lock)
> return false;
>
> + if (old->in_sleepable != cur->in_sleepable)
> + return false;
> +
> /* for states to be equal callsites have to be the same
> * and all frame states need to be equivalent
> */
> @@ -19653,6 +19694,28 @@ static int fixup_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
> desc->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rdonly_cast]) {
> insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1);
> *cnt = 1;
> + } else if (is_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl_kfunc(desc->func_id)) {
> + /* The verifier will process callback_fn as many times as necessary
> + * with different maps and the register states prepared by
> + * set_timer_callback_state will be accurate.
> + *
> + * The following use case is valid:
> + * map1 is shared by prog1, prog2, prog3.
> + * prog1 calls bpf_timer_init for some map1 elements
> + * prog2 calls bpf_timer_set_callback for some map1 elements.
> + * Those that were not bpf_timer_init-ed will return -EINVAL.
> + * prog3 calls bpf_timer_start for some map1 elements.
> + * Those that were not both bpf_timer_init-ed and
> + * bpf_timer_set_callback-ed will return -EINVAL.
> + */
Also removed this comment. It's not correct here.
> + struct bpf_insn ld_addrs[2] = {
> + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_4, (long)env->prog->aux),
> + };
> +
> + insn_buf[0] = ld_addrs[0];
> + insn_buf[1] = ld_addrs[1];
> + insn_buf[2] = *insn;
> + *cnt = 3;
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.44.0
>