Re: [PATCH v2] time/tick-sched: idle load balancing when nohz_full cpu becomes idle.

[Yun Levi]

Hi Markus.

> * Why did you repeat typos in this patch iteration?

> * Would you like to take the relevance of imperative wordings for changelogs
  better into account?

Sorry for my mistake, I've fixed it but, I sent an old one :(

Thanks

On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 7:38 PM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > When nohz_full CPU stops tick in tick_nohz_irq_exit(),
> > It wouldn't be chosen to perform idle load balancing bacause it doesn't
> …
> > So, nohz_balance_enter_idle() could be called safely without !was_stooped
> > check.
>
> * Why did you repeat typos in this patch iteration?
>
> * Would you like to take the relevance of imperative wordings for changelogs
>   better into account?
>   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9-rc7#n94
>
>
> > ---
> >  kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 6 ++++--
>
> Will further patch version descriptions become helpful behind the marker line?
>
> Regards,
> Markus