Re: [PATCH v22 2/5] ring-buffer: Introducing ring-buffer mapping functions
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Fri May 10 2024 - 14:43:05 EST
On Fri, 10 May 2024 12:03:12 +0100
Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'm not particularly happy about us calling vm_insert_pages with NULL
> > pointers stored in pages.
> >
> > Should we instead do
> >
> > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(s >= nr_subbufs)) {
> > err = -EINVAL;
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > ?
>
> I could also nr_pages = p in the event of s >= nr_subbufs... but that
> really that shouldn't happen so let's return an error.
I'm good with this. It should never happen anyway.
-- Steve