Re: [PATCH 0/2 v4] drivers: arch_topology: introduce automatic cleanup feature

[Sudeep Holla]

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 10:13:02AM +0200, Vincenzo Mezzela wrote:
> This patch series introduces the automatic cleanup feature using the __free
> attribute. With this modification, resources allocated with __free are
> automatically released at the end of the scope.
>
> In some cases, modifying the structure of loops is necessary to utilize the
> __free attribute effectively. For example:
>
> ```
> struct device_node *t;
>
> do {
>     t = of_get_child_by_name(..);
>     if (t) {
>
>         // some code here
>
>         of_node_put(t);
>     }
>     i++;
>
> } while (t);
>
> //       ^
> //       |
> //  device_node here
> ```
>
> To use the __free attribute here, we need to move the declaration of the device_node
> within the loop, otherwise the automatic cleanup is called only at the end of the
> function, and not at end of each iteration of the loop, being it scope-based.
>
> However, moving the declaration of the device_node within the loop, we can no
> longer check the exit condition in the loop statement, being it outside
> the loop's scope.
>
> Therefore, this work is split into two patches. The first patch moves the exit
> condition of the loop directly within the loop's scope with an explicit break
> statement:
>
> ```
> struct device_node *t;
>
> do {
>     t = of_get_child_by_name(..);
>     if (!t)
>         break;
>
>     // some code here
>
>     of_node_put(t);
>     i++;
>
> } while (1);
> ```
> The second patch eliminates all of_node_put() calls, introducing the __free
> attribute to the device_node.
>
>
> changes in v2:
>     - check loop exit condition within the loop
>     - add cleanup.h header
>
> changes in v3:
>     - split patch in two
>     - fix misalignment
>     - fix checkpatch warnings
>     - replace break with return statement where possible
>
> changes in v4:
>     - fix commit subject
>     - fix coding style
>

Looks good now to me.

Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>

It is merge window now, so there is a chance that it may get lost. You
may have to post it again at -rc1. Greg can then pick it up for v6.11

--
Regards,
Sudeep