Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_core: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic
From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Date: Mon May 13 2024 - 12:31:58 EST
Hi Eric,
On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 11:08 PM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 04:17:06PM +0200, Erick Archer wrote:
> > This is an effort to get rid of all multiplications from allocation
> > functions in order to prevent integer overflows [1][2].
> >
> > As the "dl" variable is a pointer to "struct hci_dev_list_req" and this
> > structure ends in a flexible array:
> >
> > struct hci_dev_list_req {
> > [...]
> > struct hci_dev_req dev_req[]; /* hci_dev_req structures */
> > };
> >
> > the preferred way in the kernel is to use the struct_size() helper to
> > do the arithmetic instead of the calculation "size + count * size" in
> > the kzalloc() and copy_to_user() functions.
> >
> > At the same time, prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang
> > of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible array members annotated with
> > __counted_by can have their accesses bounds-checked at run-time via
> > CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for
> > strcpy/memcpy-family functions).
> >
> > In this case, it is important to note that the logic needs a little
> > refactoring to ensure that the "dev_num" member is initialized before
> > the first access to the flex array. Specifically, add the assignment
> > before the list_for_each_entry() loop.
> >
> > Also remove the "size" variable as it is no longer needed and refactor
> > the list_for_each_entry() loop to use dr[n] instead of (dr + n).
Have the change above split on its own patch.
> > This way, the code is more readable, idiomatic and safer.
> >
> > This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle, and audited and
> > modified manually.
> >
> > Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]
> > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/160 [2]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <erick.archer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Looks right to me. Thanks!
>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> --
> Kees Cook
--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz