Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Mark Ethernet devices on sa8775p as DMA-coherent
From: Andrew Halaney
Date: Tue May 14 2024 - 10:21:31 EST
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 06:30:59PM GMT, Sagar Cheluvegowda wrote:
> To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: kernel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Patch 1 :- This patch marks Ethernet devices on Sa8775p as DMA-coherent
> as both the devices are cache coherent.
>
> Patch 2 :- Update the schema of qcom,ethqos to allow specifying Ethernet
> devices as "dma-coherent".
I've been keeping my eye on this series, and realized that I should know
better (but don't). How can I tell what tree these should go through?
Just trolling through the list, it seems dt-bindings go through netdev,
whereas dts changes go through the Qualcomm tree.
Is there something in the get_maintainers.pl output that I should be
interpreting differently to understand what patch should target what
maintainer tree?
halaney@x1gen2nano ~/git/linux-next (git)-[remotes/net/main] % ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ethqos.yaml :(
Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:QUALCOMM ETHQOS ETHERNET DRIVER)
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT)
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT)
"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:NETWORKING DRIVERS)
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:NETWORKING DRIVERS)
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:NETWORKING DRIVERS)
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:NETWORKING DRIVERS)
Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx> (in file)
netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:QUALCOMM ETHQOS ETHERNET DRIVER)
linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:QUALCOMM ETHQOS ETHERNET DRIVER)
devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list)
I don't know how to figure out who takes this patch in the end based on
the output above :)
ahalaney@x1gen2nano ~/git/linux-next (git)-[remotes/net/main] % ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT)
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT)
Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT)
devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list)
ahalaney@x1gen2nano ~/git/linux-next (git)-[remotes/net/main] %
This one's a little more obviously Qualcomm specific.. but yeah. Sorry
for the obvious question, was talking to Sagar offline and realized I
didn't have a good way to tell him how to figure that out other than dig
through lkml, so just asking directly here!
Thanks,
Andrew