Re: [PATCH net-next] virtio_net: Fix error code in __virtnet_get_hw_stats()
From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Wed May 15 2024 - 10:51:05 EST
On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 12:01:55PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 03:50:45PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > The virtnet_send_command_reply() function returns true on success or
> > false on failure. The "ok" variable is true/false depending on whether
> > it succeeds or not. It's up to the caller to translate the true/false
> > into -EINVAL on failure or zero for success.
> >
> > The bug is that __virtnet_get_hw_stats() returns false for both
> > errors and success. It's not a bug, but it is confusing that the caller
> > virtnet_get_hw_stats() uses an "ok" variable to store negative error
> > codes.
>
> The bug is ... It's not a bug ....
>
> I think what you are trying to say is that the error isn't
> really handled anyway, except for printing a warning,
> so it's not a big deal.
>
> Right?
>
No, I'm sorry, that was confusing. The change to __virtnet_get_hw_stats()
is a bugfix but the change to virtnet_get_hw_stats() was not a bugfix.
I viewed this all as really one thing, because it's cleaning up the
error codes which happens to fix a bug. It seems very related. At the
same time, I can also see how people would disagree.
I'm traveling until May 23. I can resend this. Probably as two patches
for simpler review.
regards,
dan carpenter