Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Use BPF filters for a "perf top -u" workaround

From: Ian Rogers
Date: Thu May 16 2024 - 01:05:07 EST


On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 9:20 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Allow uid and gid to be terms in BPF filters by first breaking the
> connection between filter terms and PERF_SAMPLE_xx values. Calculate
> the uid and gid using the bpf_get_current_uid_gid helper, rather than
> from a value in the sample. Allow filters to be passed to perf top, this allows:
>
> $ perf top -e cycles:P --filter "uid == $(id -u)"
>
> to work as a "perf top -u" workaround, as "perf top -u" usually fails
> due to processes/threads terminating between the /proc scan and the
> perf_event_open.

Fwiw, something I noticed playing around with this (my workload was
`perf test -w noploop 100000` as different users) is that old samples
appeared to linger around making terminated processes still appear in
the top list. My guess is that there aren't other samples showing up
and pushing the old sample events out of the ring buffers due to the
filter. This can look quite odd and I don't know if we have a way to
improve upon it, flush the ring buffers, histograms, etc. It appears
to be a latent `perf top` issue that you could encounter on other low
frequency events, but I thought I'd mention it anyway.

Thanks,
Ian

> Ian Rogers (3):
> perf bpf filter: Give terms their own enum
> perf bpf filter: Add uid and gid terms
> perf top: Allow filters on events
>
> tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt | 2 +-
> tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt | 4 ++
> tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 9 +++
> tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c | 55 ++++++++++++----
> tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h | 5 +-
> tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.l | 66 +++++++++----------
> tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.y | 7 +-
> tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h | 27 +++++++-
> tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c | 67 +++++++++++++++-----
> 9 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.45.0.rc1.225.g2a3ae87e7f-goog
>