Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: dsa: realtek: add LED drivers for rtl8366rb

[Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca]

> On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 02:11:30 -0300 Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca wrote:
> > +static int rtl8366rb_setup_leds(struct realtek_priv *priv)
> > +{
> > +     struct device_node *leds_np, *led_np;
> > +     struct dsa_switch *ds = &priv->ds;
> > +     struct dsa_port *dp;
> > +     int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +     dsa_switch_for_each_port(dp, ds) {
> > +             if (!dp->dn)
> > +                     continue;
> > +
> > +             leds_np = of_get_child_by_name(dp->dn, "leds");
> > +             if (!leds_np) {
> > +                     dev_dbg(priv->dev, "No leds defined for port %d",
> > +                             dp->index);
> > +                     continue;
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             for_each_child_of_node(leds_np, led_np) {
> > +                     ret = rtl8366rb_setup_led(priv, dp,
> > +                                               of_fwnode_handle(led_np));
> > +                     if (ret) {
> > +                             of_node_put(led_np);
> > +                             break;
> > +                     }
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             of_node_put(leds_np);
> > +             if (ret)
> > +                     return ret;
> > +     }
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
>
> coccicheck generates this warning:
>
> drivers/net/dsa/realtek/rtl8366rb.c:1032:4-15: ERROR: probable double put.
>
> I think it's a false positive.

Me too. I don't think it is a double put. The put for led_np is called
in the increment code inside the for_each_child_of_node macro. With a
break, we skip that part and we need to put it before leaving. I don't
know coccicheck but maybe it got confused by the double for.

> But aren't you missing a put(dp) before
> "return ret;" ?

dsa_switch_for_each_port doesn't get nodes. So, no put required.

Regards,

Luiz