Re: Extending Linux' Coverity model and also cover aarch64

From: Manthey, Norbert
Date: Fri May 17 2024 - 02:20:21 EST


On Thu, 2024-05-16 at 12:20 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
> not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender
> and know the content is safe.
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 03:28:16PM +0000, Manthey, Norbert wrote:
> > we published an extension for the Coverity model that is used by
> > the
> > CoverityScan setup for the Linux kernel [1]. We have been using
> > this
> > extension to analyze the 6.1 kernel branch, and reported some fixes
> > to
> > the upstream code base that are based on this model [2]. Feel free
> > to
> > merge the pull request, and update the model in the CoverityScan
> > setup.
> > We do not have access to that project to perform these updates
> > ourselves.
>
> Thanks for this! I'll get it loaded into the Linux-Next scanner.

Nice, thanks!

>
> > To increase the analysis coverage to aarch64, we analyzed a x86 and
> > a
> > aarch64 configuration. The increased coverage is achieved by using
> > re-
> > configuration and cross-compilation during the analysis build. If
> > you
> > are interested in this setup we can share the Dockerfile and script
> > we
> > used for this process.
>
> We've only got access to the free Coverity scanner, but it would be
> nice
> to see if there was anything specific to arm64.

Yes, I understand. Can you show how that free scanner is used? We
tweaked the command we fed into the "cov-build" tool. This tool should
be part of the scanner (if I remember that correctly).

>
> > To prevent regressions in backports to LTS kernels, we wondered
> > whether
> > the community is interested in setting up CoverityScan projects for
> > older kernel releases. Would such an extension be useful to show
> > new
> > defects in addition to the current release testing?
>
> The only one we (lightly) manage right now is the linux-next scanner.
> If
> other folks want to host scanners for -stable kernels, that would be
> interesting, yes.

Can you share explain or share pointers to how the current setup works?
If I understand that better, we can think about how to process the
other kernels.

Best,
Norbert

>
> -Kees
>
> --
> Kees Cook




Amazon Web Services Development Center Germany GmbH
Krausenstr. 38
10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Christian Schlaeger, Jonathan Weiss
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg unter HRB 257764 B
Sitz: Berlin
Ust-ID: DE 365 538 597