Re: [PATCH net] net: lan966x: Remove ptp traps in case the ptp is not enabled.

[Vladimir Oltean]

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 08:48:55AM +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > Alternatively, the -EOPNOTSUPP check could be moved before programming
> > the traps in the first place.
> 
> Thanks for the review.
> Actually I don't think this alternative will work. In case of PHY
> timestamping, we would still like to add those rules regardless if
> ptp is enabled on lan966x.
> 
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@xxxxxxx>
> 
> -- 
> /Horatiu

I don't understand why this would not have worked?

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
index b12d3b8a64fd..1439a36e8394 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
@@ -474,14 +474,14 @@ static int lan966x_port_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *dev,
 	    cfg->source != HWTSTAMP_SOURCE_PHYLIB)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
+	if (cfg->source == HWTSTAMP_SOURCE_NETDEV && !port->lan966x->ptp)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	err = lan966x_ptp_setup_traps(port, cfg);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
 	if (cfg->source == HWTSTAMP_SOURCE_NETDEV) {
-		if (!port->lan966x->ptp)
-			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
 		err = lan966x_ptp_hwtstamp_set(port, cfg, extack);
 		if (err) {
 			lan966x_ptp_del_traps(port);