Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: force write fault for atomic RMW instructions

[Yang Shi]

On 5/14/24 3:53 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 09:19:39PM -0600, Yang Shi wrote:
> > > That said, I'm not keen on this kernel workaround. If openjdk decides to
> > > improve some security and goes for PROT_EXEC-only mappings of its text
> > > sections, the above trick will no longer work.
> > I noticed futex does replace insns. IIUC, the below sequence should
> > can do the trick for exec-only, right?
> >
> > disable privileged
> > read insn with ldxr
> > enable privileged
> Do you mean not using the unprivileged LDTR as in get_user()? You don't
> even need an LDXR, just plain LDR but with the extable entry etc.
>
> However, with PIE we got proper execute-only permission (not the kind of
> fake one where we disabled the PTE_USER bit while keeping PTE_UXN as 0).
> So the futex-style approach won't work unless we changed the PIE_E1
> entry for _PAGE_EXECONLY to be PIE_R by the kernel.

I see. Thanks. Yes, I did see this works without PIE. As you said in the 
earlier email, exec-only is not that popular yet. I think we can just 
ignore it for now.

>