Re: [PATCH] bitfield.h: add FIELD_MAX_CONST

From: Yury Norov
Date: Mon May 20 2024 - 15:30:07 EST


+ Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> and
David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 07:27:31PM +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> FIELD_MAX_CONST is like FIELD_MAX, but it can be used where statement
> expressions are forbidden. For example, using FIELD_MAX in a
> static_assert gives:
> error: braced-group within expression allowed only inside a function
>
> It can be used also in array declarations, where using FIELD_MAX would
> trigger a warning :
> warning: ISO C90 forbids variable length array ‘buf’ [-Wvla]
> (It's a bit surprising, because despite the warning, gcc calculated
> the array size correctly at compile time.)
>
> A simplified example of what I actually want to use in a driver:
> #define DATA_SIZE_M GENMASK(3, 0)
> #define MAX_DATA_SIZE FIELD_MAX_CONST(DATA_SIZE_M)
> static void f(void) {
> char buf[MAX_DATA_SIZE];
> /* ... */
> }
>
> In the implementation, reuse the existing compile-time checks from
> FIELD_PREP_CONST.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Michal,

So... FIELD_MAX() already requires the _mask to be a const value.
Now you add a FIELD_MAX_CONST(), which makes it more confusing.

It looks like your new _CONST() macro would work anywhere where the
existing FIELD_MAX() works. At least for me, if I apply your patch
and do:

#define FIELD_MAX FIELD_MAX_CONST

The implementation of the 'const' version looks the same as the
'variable' one, except for that sanity checking business.

I think the right path to go would be making the __BF_FIELD_CHECK()
a structure initializers friendly by using the BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(),
just like you did with the __BF_FIELD_CHECK_CONST(), so that the
FIELD_MAX() would work in all cases.

Thanks,
Yury

> ---
> include/linux/bitfield.h | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bitfield.h b/include/linux/bitfield.h
> index 63928f173223..50bbab317319 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bitfield.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bitfield.h
> @@ -76,6 +76,16 @@
> (1ULL << __bf_shf(_mask))); \
> })
>
> +#define __BF_FIELD_CHECK_CONST(_mask, _val) \
> + ( \
> + /* mask must be non-zero */ \
> + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((_mask) == 0) + \
> + /* check if value fits */ \
> + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(~((_mask) >> __bf_shf(_mask)) & (_val)) + \
> + /* check if mask is contiguous */ \
> + __BF_CHECK_POW2((_mask) + (1ULL << __bf_shf(_mask))) \
> + )
> +
> /**
> * FIELD_MAX() - produce the maximum value representable by a field
> * @_mask: shifted mask defining the field's length and position
> @@ -89,6 +99,22 @@
> (typeof(_mask))((_mask) >> __bf_shf(_mask)); \
> })
>
> +/**
> + * FIELD_MAX_CONST() - produce the maximum value representable by a field
> + * @_mask: shifted mask defining the field's length and position
> + *
> + * FIELD_MAX_CONST() returns the maximum value that can be held in
> + * the field specified by @_mask.
> + *
> + * Unlike FIELD_MAX(), it can be used where statement expressions can't.
> + * Error checking is less comfortable for this version.
> + */
> +#define FIELD_MAX_CONST(_mask) \
> + ( \
> + __BF_FIELD_CHECK_CONST(_mask, 0ULL) + \
> + (typeof(_mask))((_mask) >> __bf_shf(_mask)) \
> + )
> +
> /**
> * FIELD_FIT() - check if value fits in the field
> * @_mask: shifted mask defining the field's length and position
> @@ -132,13 +158,7 @@
> */
> #define FIELD_PREP_CONST(_mask, _val) \
> ( \
> - /* mask must be non-zero */ \
> - BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((_mask) == 0) + \
> - /* check if value fits */ \
> - BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(~((_mask) >> __bf_shf(_mask)) & (_val)) + \
> - /* check if mask is contiguous */ \
> - __BF_CHECK_POW2((_mask) + (1ULL << __bf_shf(_mask))) + \
> - /* and create the value */ \
> + __BF_FIELD_CHECK_CONST(_mask, _val) + \
> (((typeof(_mask))(_val) << __bf_shf(_mask)) & (_mask)) \
> )
>
> --
> 2.44.0