Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] vhost-vdpa: flush workers on suspend

[Jason Wang]

On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 11:21 PM Steve Sistare
<steven.sistare@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Flush to guarantee no workers are running when suspend returns.
>
> Fixes: f345a0143b4d ("vhost-vdpa: uAPI to suspend the device")
> Signed-off-by: Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> index ba52d128aeb7..189596caaec9 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> @@ -594,6 +594,7 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_suspend(struct vhost_vdpa *v)
>         struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
>         const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config;
>         int ret;
> +       struct vhost_dev *vdev = &v->vdev;
>
>         if (!(ops->get_status(vdpa) & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK))
>                 return 0;
> @@ -601,6 +602,8 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_suspend(struct vhost_vdpa *v)
>         if (!ops->suspend)
>                 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> +       vhost_dev_flush(vdev);

vhost-vDPA doesn't use workers, see:

        vhost_dev_init(dev, vqs, nvqs, 0, 0, 0, false,
                       vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_msg);

So I wonder if this is a must.

Thanks

> +
>         ret = ops->suspend(vdpa);
>         if (!ret)
>                 v->suspended = true;
> --
> 2.39.3
>