Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] vduse: suspend

From: Jason Wang
Date: Tue May 21 2024 - 23:41:14 EST


On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 9:39 PM Steven Sistare
<steven.sistare@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 5/20/2024 10:30 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 11:21 PM Steve Sistare
> > <steven.sistare@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Support the suspend operation. There is little to do, except flush to
> >> guarantee no workers are running when suspend returns.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
> >> index 73c89701fc9d..7dc46f771f12 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
> >> @@ -472,6 +472,18 @@ static void vduse_dev_reset(struct vduse_dev *dev)
> >> up_write(&dev->rwsem);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static void vduse_flush_work(struct vduse_dev *dev)
> >> +{
> >> + flush_work(&dev->inject);
> >> +
> >> + for (int i = 0; i < dev->vq_num; i++) {
> >> + struct vduse_virtqueue *vq = dev->vqs[i];
> >> +
> >> + flush_work(&vq->inject);
> >> + flush_work(&vq->kick);
> >> + }
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static int vduse_vdpa_set_vq_address(struct vdpa_device *vdpa, u16 idx,
> >> u64 desc_area, u64 driver_area,
> >> u64 device_area)
> >> @@ -724,6 +736,17 @@ static int vduse_vdpa_reset(struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static int vduse_vdpa_suspend(struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
> >> +{
> >> + struct vduse_dev *dev = vdpa_to_vduse(vdpa);
> >> +
> >> + down_write(&dev->rwsem);
> >> + vduse_flush_work(dev);
> >> + up_write(&dev->rwsem);
> >
> > Can this forbid the new work to be scheduled?
>
> Are you suggesting I return an error below if the dev is suspended?
> I can do that.

I mean the irq injection work can still be scheduled after vduse_vdpa_suspend().

>
> However, I now suspect this implementation of vduse_vdpa_suspend is not
> complete in other ways, so I withdraw this patch pending future work.
> Thanks for looking at it.

Ok.

Thanks

>
> - Steve
>
> > static int vduse_dev_queue_irq_work(struct vduse_dev *dev,
> > struct work_struct *irq_work,
> > int irq_effective_cpu)
> > {
> > int ret = -EINVAL;
> >
> > down_read(&dev->rwsem);
> > if (!(dev->status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK))
> > goto unlock;
> >
> > ret = 0;
> > if (irq_effective_cpu == IRQ_UNBOUND)
> > queue_work(vduse_irq_wq, irq_work);
> > else
> > queue_work_on(irq_effective_cpu,
> > vduse_irq_bound_wq, irq_work);
> > unlock:
> > up_read(&dev->rwsem);
> >
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static u32 vduse_vdpa_get_generation(struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
> >> {
> >> struct vduse_dev *dev = vdpa_to_vduse(vdpa);
> >> @@ -806,6 +829,7 @@ static const struct vdpa_config_ops vduse_vdpa_config_ops = {
> >> .set_vq_affinity = vduse_vdpa_set_vq_affinity,
> >> .get_vq_affinity = vduse_vdpa_get_vq_affinity,
> >> .reset = vduse_vdpa_reset,
> >> + .suspend = vduse_vdpa_suspend,
> >> .set_map = vduse_vdpa_set_map,
> >> .free = vduse_vdpa_free,
> >> };
> >> --
> >> 2.39.3
> >>
> >
>