[PATCH] fix

[Alisa-Dariana Roman]

---

Would this fix be alright, since writing something like if(!ret) may be
confusing?

And regarding the comment, my bad, there is nothing wrong there.

 drivers/iio/adc/ad7192.c | 9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7192.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7192.c
index 101afce49378..0789121236d6 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7192.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7192.c
@@ -1101,14 +1101,12 @@ static int ad7194_parse_channels(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
 		ret = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(child, "diff-channels",
 						     ain, ARRAY_SIZE(ain));
 		if (ret == 0) {
-			ret = ad7194_validate_ain_channel(dev, ain[0]);
-			if (ret)
+			if (!ad7194_validate_ain_channel(dev, ain[0]))
 				return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
 						     "Invalid AIN channel: %u\n",
 						     ain[0]);
 
-			ret = ad7194_validate_ain_channel(dev, ain[1]);
-			if (ret)
+			if (!ad7194_validate_ain_channel(dev, ain[1]))
 				return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
 						     "Invalid AIN channel: %u\n",
 						     ain[1]);
@@ -1125,8 +1123,7 @@ static int ad7194_parse_channels(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
 				return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
 						     "Missing channel property\n");
 
-			ret = ad7194_validate_ain_channel(dev, ain[0]);
-			if (ret)
+			if (!ad7194_validate_ain_channel(dev, ain[0]))
 				return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
 						     "Invalid AIN channel: %u\n",
 						     ain[0]);
-- 
2.34.1