Re: [v3 PATCH] hwrng: core - Remove add_early_randomness

[Torsten Duwe]

On Thu, 23 May 2024 12:49:50 +0800
Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 03:53:23PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > 
> > That said, looking at the code in question, there are other oddities
> > going on. Even the "we found a favorite new rng" case looks rather
> > strange. The thread we use - nice and asynchronous - seems to sleep
> > only if the randomness source is emptied.
> > 
> > What if you have a really good source of hw randomness? That looks
> > like a busy loop to me, but hopefully I'm missing something obvious.
> 
> Yes that does look strange.  So I dug up the original patch at
> 
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/all/20140317165012.GC1763@xxxxxx/
> 
> and therein lies the answer.  It's relying on random.c to push back
> when the amount of new entropy exceeds what it needs.  IOW we will
> sleep via add_hwgenerator_randomness when random.c decides that
> enough is enough.

Yes, I thought that this was the obvious choice, the lesser evil. If it
just discarded the excess and returned immediately I had expected some
kernel threads to spin constantly.

>  In fact the rate is much less now compared to
> when the patch was first applied.

You mean the rate of required entropy? Doesn't that make things worse?
Maybe redesign the API to use a pull scheme? RNGs register at the
randomness facility with a callback that can be used when there is a
need for fresh entropy?

	Torsten